Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #54,273 of 84,120 nationally
Oakwood Eviction Risk: Lower , Crafton
Tract 42003469000 · Allegheny County, PA · pop 4,870 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
42003469000 is a census tract in the Oakwood area of Green Tree, PA. It scores 3.7/10 for landlords. It is home to 4,870 residents. The voucher gap is 31.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%
Stable renters 15%
Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units2,459
Renter share23.7%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate9.4%
Median income$87,828
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
32
th percentile
Low
Within state
39
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Crafton and the region
Centroid at 40.4171, -80.0543 · click any tract to drill in
Why Oakwood scores 3.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Crafton
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
9.4% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,685 rent vs county FMR
8.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Crafton
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Crafton
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Crafton
5.4
How Oakwood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 9
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 6%Socioeconomic
- 31%Household composition
- 16%Racial/ethnic minority
- 20%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 2%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 55Total filings over 7 yrs
- 4.12%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.1%Peak (2002)
- 8Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Oakwood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Oakwood
The severe-burden share is 22%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 8.2/10. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 7.8/10.
Against the Allegheny County average of 5.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.3 points. Running cool, economic stress reads 2.4/10.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 55 filings here across 7 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2002 at 5.1% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 4.1% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 35% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 24% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 1.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the PA average is 4.6, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 38% of renters.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 42003469000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42003469000?
Census tract 42003469000 in the Oakwood neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 42003469000?
Median gross rent is $1,685/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 42003469000?
9.4% of residents in tract 42003469000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,870.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 42003469000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 31th, minority 16th, housing 20th.
Q5
Is tract 42003469000 considered part of Oakwood?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42003469000 fall within Oakwood (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42003469000?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 55 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42003469000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.12% of renter households, peaking at 5.1% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
How does tract 42003469000 compare to Crafton overall?
Tract 42003469000 scores 3.7/10, lower than the parent city of Crafton at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Crafton; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 42003469000 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 2% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related