Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #54,273 of 84,120 nationally

Lincoln Place Eviction Risk: Lower , Pittsburgh

Tract 42003488500 · Allegheny County, PA · pop 2,797 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 42003488500 covers part of the Lincoln Place area of West Mifflin, PA, and scores 3.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,797. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.1/10.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 15% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,308
Renter share21.9%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate4.4%
Median income$69,423

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Lincoln Place
Very Low
Within parent city
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Pittsburgh
Low
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#265 of 394 tracts In Allegheny County
Low
Within state
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#2,105 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pittsburgh and the region

Centroid at 40.3589, -79.9340 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lincoln Place scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pittsburgh
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
4.4% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$789 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pittsburgh
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pittsburgh
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pittsburgh
5.3

How Lincoln Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lincoln Place risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.7This tracttract 4885005.9Pittsburghparent city5.0Countyavg tract in county4.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 31

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 90Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 4.82%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.4%Peak (2001)
  • 10Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 42003488500
Filings dropped 17% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lincoln Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lincoln Place

On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.2/10. The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. It sits 1.3 points below the Allegheny County average of 5.0.

34% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, below the Allegheny County average of 40.6%. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.8/10. The filing record is not thin: 90 evictions over 7 years of observation.

The worst year on record was 2001, when 6.4% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 4.8% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #54,273 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 22% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 42003488500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42003488500?

Census tract 42003488500 in the Lincoln Place neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42003488500?

Median gross rent is $789/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42003488500?

4.4% of residents in tract 42003488500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,797.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42003488500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 34th, household 29th, minority 24th, housing 41th.
Q5

Is tract 42003488500 considered part of Lincoln Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42003488500 fall within Lincoln Place (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42003488500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 90 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42003488500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.82% of renter households, peaking at 6.4% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 42003488500 compare to Pittsburgh overall?

Tract 42003488500 scores 3.7/10, lower than the parent city of Pittsburgh at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pittsburgh eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 42003488500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pittsburgh

Top eight tracts in Pittsburgh ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related