Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #17,132 of 84,120 nationally

Lincoln Place Eviction Risk: Elevated , Pittsburgh

Tract 42003310200 · Allegheny County, PA · pop 3,272 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Tract 42003310200 sits in the Lincoln Place area of Pittsburgh eviction risk, PA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.2/10. Cost burden runs 13% here against 40.6% across Allegheny County.

Risk score
6.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 10% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,429
Renter share11.8%
SVI overall0.19
Poverty rate13.3%
Median income$80,213

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Lincoln Place
Very High
Within parent city
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#77 of 128 tracts In Pittsburgh
Moderate
Within county
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#112 of 394 tracts In Allegheny County
Elevated
Within state
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#570 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pittsburgh and the region

Centroid at 40.3714, -79.9141 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lincoln Place scores 6.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pittsburgh
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
13.3% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$984 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pittsburgh
4.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pittsburgh
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pittsburgh
6.0

How Lincoln Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lincoln Place risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.2This tracttract 3102005.9Pittsburghparent city5.0Countyavg tract in county4.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 19

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 56Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 3.61%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.4%Peak (2002)
  • 5Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 42003310200
Filings dropped 44% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lincoln Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lincoln Place

What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 7.8/10. Average gross rent is $984, 22% below the Pittsburgh average.

Against the Allegheny County average of 5.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.2 points. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.7/10.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 56 filings here across 7 tracked years. Severe burden reaches 8%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Filings peaked in 2002 at 9.4% of renter households.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 3.6% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #17,132 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Only 12% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.7/10. Rent consumes only 15% of average household income of $80,213, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 42003310200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42003310200?

Census tract 42003310200 in the Lincoln Place neighborhood scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42003310200?

Median gross rent is $984/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 13% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42003310200?

13.3% of residents in tract 42003310200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,272.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42003310200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 19th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 55th, minority 9th, housing 7th.
Q5

Is tract 42003310200 considered part of Lincoln Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42003310200 fall within Lincoln Place (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42003310200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 56 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42003310200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.61% of renter households, peaking at 9.4% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 42003310200 compare to Pittsburgh overall?

Tract 42003310200 scores 6.2/10, higher than the parent city of Pittsburgh at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pittsburgh eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 42003310200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 36% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pittsburgh

Top eight tracts in Pittsburgh ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related