Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #3,733 of 84,120 nationally

Reading Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 42011002500 · Berks County, PA · pop 3,776

In Reading, census tract 42011002500 scores 7.2/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 96% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 60% of renter households, a severe level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $827 monthly, set against $19,629 in average yearly household income, roughly 51% of income at the averages. Renters make up 85% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
7.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 51% Stable renters 34% Owners 15%
Tract context
Occupied units1,375
Renter share84.7%
SVI overall1.00
Poverty rate53.2%
Median income$19,629

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 28 tracts In Reading
Very High
Within county
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 107 tracts In Berks County
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Very High
National
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#3,733 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Reading and the region

Centroid at 40.3334, -75.9346 · click any tract to drill in

Why Reading scores 7.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Reading
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
53.2% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$827 rent vs county FMR
1.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Reading
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Reading
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Reading
8.2

How Reading compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Reading risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.37.3This tracttract 002500Reading: 4.44.4Readingparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 100

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 579Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 9.33%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.3%Peak (2006)
  • 94Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 420110025002000: 83 filings (8.68/100 renter HHs)2001: 74 filings (7.74/100 renter HHs)2002: 88 filings (9.21/100 renter HHs)2003: 69 filings (7.22/100 renter HHs)2004: 87 filings (9.10/100 renter HHs)2005: 84 filings (11.03/100 renter HHs)2006: 94 filings (12.34/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Reading

What moves this score most is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Reading eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well above the Berks County average of 5.7 and above the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 100th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 579 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 9.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 12.3% of renter households in 2006.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 42011002500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42011002500?

Census tract 42011002500 in Reading scores 7.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42011002500?

Median gross rent is $827/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42011002500?

53.2% of residents in tract 42011002500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,776.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42011002500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 100th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 100th, minority 85th, housing 99th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42011002500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 579 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42011002500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.33% of renter households, peaking at 12.3% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 42011002500 compare to Reading overall?

Tract 42011002500 scores 7.3/10, higher than the parent city of Reading at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Reading eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Reading

Top eight tracts in Reading ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related