Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally

Neshaminy Falls Eviction Risk: Lower , Trevose

Tract 42017101405 · Bucks County, PA · pop 5,932 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 42017101405 covers the Neshaminy Falls area of Trevose, home to 5,932 residents. For landlords it grades 5.9/10, a moderate reading. It lands near the 71st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

38% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,403 a month against an average household income of $82,527 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 37% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 23% Owners 63%
Tract context
Occupied units2,504
Renter share36.5%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate5.9%
Median income$82,527

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Neshaminy Falls
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Trevose
Moderate
Within county
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#49 of 147 tracts In Bucks County
Elevated
Within state
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#2,700 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Trevose and the region

Centroid at 40.1524, -74.9866 · click any tract to drill in

Why Neshaminy Falls scores 2.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Trevose
8.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
5.9% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,403 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Trevose
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Trevose
6.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Trevose
6.2

How Neshaminy Falls compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Neshaminy Falls risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.32.3This tracttract 101405Trevose: 3.93.9Trevoseparent cityCounty: 2.22.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 608Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 8.06%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.6%Peak (2006)
  • 180Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 420171014052000: 64 filings (6.27/100 renter HHs)2001: 49 filings (4.80/100 renter HHs)2002: 32 filings (3.13/100 renter HHs)2003: 93 filings (9.10/100 renter HHs)2004: 92 filings (9.01/100 renter HHs)2005: 98 filings (8.50/100 renter HHs)2006: 180 filings (15.61/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 181% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Neshaminy Falls. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Neshaminy Falls

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Trevose, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Bucks County average of 5.4 and above the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 51st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 608 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 8.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 15.6% of renter households in 2006.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 42017101405

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42017101405?

Census tract 42017101405 in the Neshaminy Falls neighborhood scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42017101405?

Median gross rent is $1,403/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42017101405?

5.9% of residents in tract 42017101405 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,932.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42017101405?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 50th, household 67th, minority 34th, housing 42th.
Q5

Is tract 42017101405 considered part of Neshaminy Falls?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42017101405 fall within Neshaminy Falls (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42017101405?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 608 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42017101405 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.06% of renter households, peaking at 15.6% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 42017101405 compare to Trevose overall?

Tract 42017101405 scores 2.3/10, lower than the parent city of Trevose at 3.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Trevose; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related