Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,660 of 84,120 nationally
Drexel Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , New Cumberland
Tract 42041010800 · Cumberland County, PA · pop 3,798 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Tract 42041010800, home to 3,798 residents in the Drexel Hills area of New Cumberland, scores 5.9/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 71st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 56% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $968 a month against an average household income of $76,473 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 47% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26%
Stable renters 21%
Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,925
Renter share47.0%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate9.3%
Median income$76,473
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
54
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
40
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across New Cumberland and the region
Centroid at 40.2261, -76.8684 · click any tract to drill in
Why Drexel Hills scores 3.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from New Cumberland
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
9.3% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$968 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from New Cumberland
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from New Cumberland
6.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from New Cumberland
6.2
How Drexel Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 38
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 68%Socioeconomic
- 49%Household composition
- 31%Racial/ethnic minority
- 10%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 37%Grade B
- 15%Grade C
- 3%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 75Total filings over 3 yrs
- 3.09%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.2%Peak (2000)
- 24Filings in 2004 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Drexel Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Drexel Hills
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from New Cumberland, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Cumberland County average of 5.1 and above the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 75 eviction filings here over 3 tracked years, with about 3.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.2% of renter households in 2000.
Part of this tract, about 3% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was B ("Still Desirable"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 42041010800
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42041010800?
Census tract 42041010800 in the Drexel Hills neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 42041010800?
Median gross rent is $968/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 42041010800?
9.3% of residents in tract 42041010800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,798.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 42041010800?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 68th, household 49th, minority 31th, housing 10th.
Q5
Is tract 42041010800 considered part of Drexel Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42041010800 fall within Drexel Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42041010800?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 75 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 42041010800 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.09% of renter households, peaking at 3.2% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
How does tract 42041010800 compare to New Cumberland overall?
Tract 42041010800 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of New Cumberland at 3.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from New Cumberland; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 42041010800 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 3% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in New Cumberland
Top eight tracts in New Cumberland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related