Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally

Paxtang Manor Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 42043022100 · Dauphin County, PA · pop 4,236 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Tract 42043022100 sits in the Paxtang Manor area of Progress, PA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.6/10. Population here is 4,236. Against Dauphin County at 39.0%, 57% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 17% Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units1,902
Renter share38.7%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$75,577

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Paxtang Manor
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Paxtang
Moderate
Within county
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#44 of 67 tracts In Dauphin County
Low
Within state
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#2,199 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Paxtang and the region

Centroid at 40.2777, -76.8322 · click any tract to drill in

Why Paxtang Manor scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Paxtang
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,180 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Paxtang
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Paxtang
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Paxtang
4.5

How Paxtang Manor compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Paxtang Manor risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.6This tracttract 0221003.8Paxtangparent city4.6Countyavg tract in county4.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 343Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 12.02%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.5%Peak (2005)
  • 58Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 42043022100
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Paxtang Manor. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Paxtang Manor

The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.5/10. Severe burden reaches 22%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.3/10.

On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.8/10. Against the Dauphin County average of 4.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.0 points.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 343 filings here across 6 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2005 at 12.5% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 12.0% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 33rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.4/10.

Statewide the PA average is 4.6, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $1,180, close to the Progress average.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 42043022100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42043022100?

Census tract 42043022100 in the Paxtang Manor neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42043022100?

Median gross rent is $1,180/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42043022100?

7.1% of residents in tract 42043022100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,236.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42043022100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 40th, household 83th, minority 66th, housing 85th.
Q5

Is tract 42043022100 considered part of Paxtang Manor?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42043022100 fall within Paxtang Manor (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42043022100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 343 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 42043022100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.02% of renter households, peaking at 12.5% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 42043022100 compare to Paxtang overall?

Tract 42043022100 scores 3.6/10, right in line with the parent city of Paxtang at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Paxtang; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 42043022100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Paxtang

Top eight tracts in Paxtang ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related