Neighborhood · Ranked #57,812 of 84,120 nationally
Paxtang Manor Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 42043023100 ·
Dauphin County, PA · pop 1,681 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Tract 42043023100 sits in the Paxtang Manor area of Paxtang, PA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.5/10. It is home to 1,681 residents. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.5/10.
Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%Stable renters 14%Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units674
Renter share23.1%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate9.2%
Median income$83,571
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Paxtang Manor
Very Low
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Paxtang
Moderate
Within county
30th percentile
#47 of 67 tracts In Dauphin County
Low
Within state
33th percentile
#2,304 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Paxtang and the region
Centroid at 40.2623, -76.8342 · click any tract to drill in
Why Paxtang Manor scores 3.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Paxtang
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
9.2% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$1,085 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Paxtang
4.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Paxtang
5.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Paxtang
4.9
How Paxtang Manor compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 41
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
49%Socioeconomic
68%Household composition
59%Racial/ethnic minority
14%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
43%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
37Total filings over 6 yrs
3.88%Avg annual filing rate
9.6%Peak (2006)
15Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year2000 to 2006
Filings climbed 150% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Paxtang Manor. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. On the softer side, economic stress reads 2.3/10. Against the Dauphin County average of 4.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.1 points.
Court records carry 37 eviction filings across 6 observed years. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.9/10.
Filings peaked in 2006 at 9.6% of renter households. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Harrisburg. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 3.9% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 31st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 23% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $83,571, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the PA average is 4.6, so this tract runs 1.1 points cooler.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 42043023100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42043023100?
Census tract 42043023100 in the Paxtang Manor neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 42043023100?
Median gross rent is $1,085/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 42043023100?
9.2% of residents in tract 42043023100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,681.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 42043023100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 49th, household 68th, minority 59th, housing 14th.
Q5
Is tract 42043023100 considered part of Paxtang Manor?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42043023100 fall within Paxtang Manor (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42043023100?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 37 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 42043023100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.88% of renter households, peaking at 9.6% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
How does tract 42043023100 compare to Paxtang overall?
Tract 42043023100 scores 3.5/10, lower than the parent city of Paxtang at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Paxtang; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 42043023100 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.