Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally

Bellefonte Eviction Risk: Lower , Cranston

Tract 44007013600 · Providence County, RI · pop 3,015 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

How risky is the Bellefonte neighborhood of Cranston for landlords? Census tract 44007013600 scores 5.1/10, the Moderate tier. On the national scale it ranks #49,437 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 27% of renter households, a moderate level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,605 monthly, set against $93,029 in average yearly household income, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 35% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 25% Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,125
Renter share34.8%
SVI overall0.35
Poverty rate3.5%
Median income$93,029

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Bellefonte
Moderate
Within parent city
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#12 of 17 tracts In Cranston
Low
Within county
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#123 of 145 tracts In Providence County
Very Low
Within state
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#177 of 247 tracts In Rhode Island
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cranston and the region

Centroid at 41.7683, -71.4185 · click any tract to drill in

Why Bellefonte scores 2.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cranston
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Rhode Island legislature & governorship
5.5
Economic stress
3.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,605 rent vs county FMR
4.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cranston
3.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cranston
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cranston
5.5

How Bellefonte compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Bellefonte risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.32.3This tracttract 013600Cranston: 5.25.2Cranstonparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 35

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 41Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 5.58%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.6%Peak (2016)
  • 24Filings in 2016 (latest validated)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 94Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.81×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (3.20× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Portland, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Bellefonte

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cranston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Providence County average of 6.1 and below the Rhode Island statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 41 eviction filings here over 2 tracked years, with about 5.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 6.6% of renter households in 2016.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 35th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 44007013600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 44007013600?

Census tract 44007013600 in the Bellefonte neighborhood scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 44007013600?

Median gross rent is $1,605/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 44007013600?

3.5% of residents in tract 44007013600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,015.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 44007013600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 49th, household 60th, minority 67th, housing 8th.
Q5

Is tract 44007013600 considered part of Bellefonte?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 44007013600 fall within Bellefonte (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 44007013600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 41 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 44007013600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.58% of renter households, peaking at 6.6% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 44007013600 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.81× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Portland, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 44007013600 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 44007013600 compare to Cranston overall?

Tract 44007013600 scores 2.3/10, lower than the parent city of Cranston at 5.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cranston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 44007013600 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cranston

Top eight tracts in Cranston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related