Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally

Pleasant Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , North Charleston

Tract 45019003113 · Charleston County, SC · pop 4,851 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Tract 45019003113, home to 4,851 residents in the Pleasant Hills area of North Charleston, scores 5.3/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 48% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 57% of renter households, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,344 monthly, set against $60,707 in average yearly household income, roughly 27% of income at the averages. Renters make up 68% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38% Stable renters 29% Owners 33%
Tract context
Occupied units2,290
Renter share67.6%
SVI overall0.85
Poverty rate12.6%
Median income$60,707

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Pleasant Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#15 of 31 tracts In North Charleston
Moderate
Within county
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#24 of 98 tracts In Charleston County
High
Within state
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#637 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across North Charleston and the region

Centroid at 32.9546, -80.0730 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pleasant Hills scores 4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from North Charleston
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
12.6% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,344 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from North Charleston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North Charleston
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from North Charleston
3.0

How Pleasant Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pleasant Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.04.0This tracttract 003113North Charleston: 2.62.6North Charlestonparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 85

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 557Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 25.60%Avg annual filing rate
  • 34.4%Peak (2014)
  • 132Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450190031132012: 112 filings (20.59/100 renter HHs)2013: 126 filings (23.16/100 renter HHs)2014: 187 filings (34.38/100 renter HHs)2015: 132 filings (24.26/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 18% over the past 4 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,369Total filings 2020-21
  • 17.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 13.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.37×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 19 filings (1.23× baseline)2020-02-01: 17 filings (1.48× baseline)2020-03-01: 15 filings (1.25× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 5 filings (0.47× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-07-01: 4 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-08-01: 9 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-09-01: 10 filings (0.70× baseline)2020-10-01: 12 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 20 filings (1.78× baseline)2020-12-01: 7 filings (0.34× baseline)2021-01-01: 9 filings (0.58× baseline)2021-02-01: 9 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-03-01: 12 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 5 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-05-01: 6 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-06-01: 6 filings (0.39× baseline)2021-07-01: 4 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-08-01: 9 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-09-01: 7 filings (0.49× baseline)2021-10-01: 10 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-11-01: 9 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-12-01: 14 filings (0.68× baseline)2022-01-01: 20 filings (1.29× baseline)2022-02-01: 13 filings (1.16× baseline)2022-03-01: 8 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-04-01: 15 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-05-01: 14 filings (1.30× baseline)2022-06-01: 16 filings (1.05× baseline)2022-07-01: 12 filings (0.87× baseline)2022-08-01: 16 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-09-01: 22 filings (1.54× baseline)2022-10-01: 12 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 28 filings (2.49× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.10× baseline)2023-01-01: 27 filings (1.74× baseline)2023-02-01: 21 filings (1.87× baseline)2023-03-01: 26 filings (2.17× baseline)2023-04-01: 19 filings (1.52× baseline)2023-05-01: 29 filings (2.70× baseline)2023-06-01: 40 filings (2.62× baseline)2023-07-01: 32 filings (2.33× baseline)2023-08-01: 15 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-09-01: 21 filings (1.47× baseline)2023-10-01: 23 filings (1.92× baseline)2023-11-01: 29 filings (2.58× baseline)2023-12-01: 24 filings (1.17× baseline)2024-01-01: 21 filings (1.35× baseline)2024-02-01: 14 filings (1.22× baseline)2024-03-01: 29 filings (2.42× baseline)2024-04-01: 21 filings (1.68× baseline)2024-05-01: 23 filings (2.14× baseline)2024-06-01: 21 filings (1.38× baseline)2024-07-01: 34 filings (2.47× baseline)2024-08-01: 23 filings (1.28× baseline)2024-09-01: 28 filings (1.96× baseline)2024-10-01: 29 filings (2.42× baseline)2024-11-01: 40 filings (3.56× baseline)2024-12-01: 42 filings (2.05× baseline)2025-01-01: 37 filings (2.39× baseline)2025-02-01: 30 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-03-01: 25 filings (2.08× baseline)2025-04-01: 19 filings (1.52× baseline)2025-05-01: 24 filings (2.23× baseline)2025-06-01: 32 filings (2.10× baseline)2025-07-01: 20 filings (1.45× baseline)2025-08-01: 37 filings (2.06× baseline)2025-09-01: 37 filings (2.60× baseline)2025-10-01: 33 filings (2.75× baseline)2025-11-01: 40 filings (3.56× baseline)2025-12-01: 5 filings (0.24× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Charleston, SC as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Pleasant Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pleasant Hills

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 3.2/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from North Charleston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Charleston County average of 5.2 and in line with the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 15.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.37x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45019003113

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45019003113?

Census tract 45019003113 in the Pleasant Hills neighborhood scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45019003113?

Median gross rent is $1,344/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45019003113?

12.6% of residents in tract 45019003113 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,851.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45019003113?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 48th, minority 82th, housing 90th.
Q5

Is tract 45019003113 considered part of Pleasant Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45019003113 fall within Pleasant Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45019003113?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 557 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 45019003113 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 25.60% of renter households, peaking at 34.4% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 45019003113 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.37× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Charleston eviction risk, SC), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 45019003113 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 45019003113 compare to North Charleston overall?

Tract 45019003113 scores 4/10, higher than the parent city of North Charleston at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North Charleston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in North Charleston

Top eight tracts in North Charleston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related