Forest Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Columbia
Tract 45079001100 · Richland County, SC · pop 3,864 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 45079001100 (the Forest Hills area of Columbia, South Carolina) comes in at 5.8/10, the Moderate tier. It lands near the 67th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 48% of renter households, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,054 a month while the average household earns $55,441 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 39% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Columbia and the region
Centroid at 34.0228, -81.0032 · click any tract to drill in
Why Forest Hills scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Forest Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 78
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 83%Socioeconomic
- 72%Household composition
- 68%Racial/ethnic minority
- 58%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 7%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 958Total filings over 5 yrs
- 20.15%Avg annual filing rate
- 21.7%Peak (2011)
- 206Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.8%Housing insecurity
- 9.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 16.8%Food insecurity
- 11.9%SNAP enrollment
- 9.0%Transit barriers
- 10.7%No health insurance
- 14.9%Frequent mental distress
- 33.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Forest Hills
The score leans hardest on economic stress at 5.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Columbia eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Richland County average of 5.8 and in line with the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 958 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 20.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 21.7% of renter households in 2011.
The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 78th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 45079001100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45079001100?
What is the average rent in tract 45079001100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 45079001100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 45079001100?
Is tract 45079001100 considered part of Forest Hills?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45079001100?
What share of households in tract 45079001100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 45079001100 compare to Columbia overall?
Was tract 45079001100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Columbia
Top eight tracts in Columbia ranked by composite eviction-risk score.