Hollywood-Rose Hill Eviction Risk: Elevated , Columbia
Tract 45079002800 · Richland County, SC · pop 7,081 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Census tract 45079002800 runs through Hollywood-Rose Hill in Columbia. With 7,081 residents, it scores 6.5/10 for landlords. It lands near the 86th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 66% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 60% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,231 a month against an average household income of $15,489 a year, roughly 95% of income at the averages. About 88% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Columbia and the region
Centroid at 33.9821, -81.0333 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hollywood-Rose Hill scores 6.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Hollywood-Rose Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 71
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 85%Socioeconomic
- 1%Household composition
- 45%Racial/ethnic minority
- 100%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 24%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 838Total filings over 5 yrs
- 11.72%Avg annual filing rate
- 18.8%Peak (2011)
- 72Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Hollywood-Rose Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 20.5%Housing insecurity
- 16.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 34.2%Food insecurity
- 26.9%SNAP enrollment
- 22.6%Transit barriers
- 15.6%No health insurance
- 29.3%Frequent mental distress
- 42.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Hollywood-Rose Hill
The heaviest input here is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Columbia eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Richland County average of 5.8 and above the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 838 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 11.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 18.8% of renter households in 2011.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 71st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 45079002800
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45079002800?
What is the average rent in tract 45079002800?
What is the poverty rate in tract 45079002800?
How socially vulnerable is tract 45079002800?
Is tract 45079002800 considered part of Hollywood-Rose Hill?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45079002800?
What share of households in tract 45079002800 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 45079002800 compare to Columbia overall?
Was tract 45079002800 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Columbia
Top eight tracts in Columbia ranked by composite eviction-risk score.