Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,414 of 84,120 nationally

Kilbourne Heights Eviction Risk: Lower , Forest Acres

Tract 45079011202 · Richland County, SC · pop 3,418 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Tract 45079011202 sits in the Kilbourne Heights area of Forest Acres, SC, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.1/10. It is home to 3,418 residents. Cost burden runs 67% here against 49.7% across Richland County.

Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 6% Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,844
Renter share18.7%
SVI overall0.49
Poverty rate8.1%
Median income$66,944

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Kilbourne Heights
Very High
Within parent city
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 tracts In Forest Acres
High
Within county
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#70 of 98 tracts In Richland County
Low
Within state
32 th percentile
Rank, 32nd percentileLowHigh
#902 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Forest Acres and the region

Centroid at 34.0261, -80.9779 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kilbourne Heights scores 3.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Forest Acres
7.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.9
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
8.1% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,360 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forest Acres
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forest Acres
4.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forest Acres
6.3

How Kilbourne Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kilbourne Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.1This tracttract 0112023.7Forest Acresparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 49

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 682Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 38.43%Avg annual filing rate
  • 46.7%Peak (2011)
  • 148Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 45079011202
Filings climbed 20% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Kilbourne Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kilbourne Heights

What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.8/10. 23% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.1/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2/10. SNAP participation runs 4.1% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 7.4% against 17.8% nationally. It sits 1.1 points below the Richland County average of 4.2.

The filing record is not thin: 682 evictions over 5 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2011 at 46.7% of renter households. In a typical year about 38.4% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #65,414 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 19% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 45079011202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45079011202?

Census tract 45079011202 in the Kilbourne Heights neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45079011202?

Median gross rent is $1,360/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45079011202?

8.1% of residents in tract 45079011202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,418.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45079011202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 49th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 77th, minority 29th, housing 38th.
Q5

Is tract 45079011202 considered part of Kilbourne Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45079011202 fall within Kilbourne Heights (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45079011202?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 682 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45079011202 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 38.43% of renter households, peaking at 46.7% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45079011202 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45079011202 compare to Forest Acres overall?

Tract 45079011202 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of Forest Acres at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forest Acres; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Forest Acres

Top eight tracts in Forest Acres ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related