Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,643 of 84,120 nationally

Quail Hollow Eviction Risk: Moderate , Ben Avon

Tract 45083022101 · Spartanburg County, SC · pop 3,347 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Here is how census tract 45083022101, in Quail Hollow in Ben Avon, looks to a landlord: a 5.7/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 3,347. On the national scale it ranks #30,872 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 40% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 34% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,070 monthly, set against $74,773 in average yearly household income, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 40% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 24% Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units1,544
Renter share40.4%
SVI overall0.25
Poverty rate9.6%
Median income$74,773

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Quail Hollow
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Ben Avon
Moderate
Within county
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#45 of 87 tracts In Spartanburg County
Moderate
Within state
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#574 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Ben Avon and the region

Centroid at 34.9349, -81.8645 · click any tract to drill in

Why Quail Hollow scores 4.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Ben Avon
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
9.6% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,070 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ben Avon
5.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ben Avon
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ben Avon
6.5

How Quail Hollow compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Quail Hollow risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.24.2This tracttract 022101Ben Avon: 2.52.5Ben Avonparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 25

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 204Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 37.64%Avg annual filing rate
  • 37.6%Peak (2010)
  • 204Filings in 2010 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Quail Hollow

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Ben Avon, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Spartanburg County average of 5.5 and in line with the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 25th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 204 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 37.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 37.6% of renter households in 2010.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45083022101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45083022101?

Census tract 45083022101 in the Quail Hollow neighborhood scores 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45083022101?

Median gross rent is $1,070/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45083022101?

9.6% of residents in tract 45083022101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,347.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45083022101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 25th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 39th, household 3th, minority 39th, housing 54th.
Q5

Is tract 45083022101 considered part of Quail Hollow?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45083022101 fall within Quail Hollow (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45083022101?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 204 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 45083022101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 37.64% of renter households, peaking at 37.6% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45083022101 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45083022101 compare to Ben Avon overall?

Tract 45083022101 scores 4.2/10, higher than the parent city of Ben Avon at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ben Avon; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related