Neighborhood · Ranked #26,446 of 84,120 nationally
Southern Pines Eviction Risk: Moderate , Converse
Tract 45083022201 ·
Spartanburg County, SC · pop 4,385 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Southern Pines in Converse anchors census tract 45083022201, which lands at 6.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 79th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
62% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,132 a month while the average household earns $55,903 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 26% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%Stable renters 10%Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units1,694
Renter share26.3%
SVI overall0.75
Poverty rate15.4%
Median income$55,903
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Southern Pines
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Converse
Moderate
Within county
69th percentile
#28 of 87 tracts In Spartanburg County
Elevated
Within state
75th percentile
#330 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Converse and the region
Centroid at 34.9834, -81.8364 · click any tract to drill in
Why Southern Pines scores 4.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Converse
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
15.4% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
$1,132 rent vs county FMR
4.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Converse
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Converse
8.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Converse
5.7
How Southern Pines compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 75
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
75%Socioeconomic
87%Household composition
36%Racial/ethnic minority
57%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
140Total filings over 1 yrs
26.27%Avg annual filing rate
26.3%Peak (2010)
140Filings in 2010 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
13.6%Housing insecurity
8.9%Utility-shutoff threat
18.8%Food insecurity
11.9%SNAP enrollment
9.1%Transit barriers
13.2%No health insurance
17.6%Frequent mental distress
37.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Southern Pines
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Converse, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Spartanburg County average of 5.5 and above the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 13.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 75th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 45083022201
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45083022201?
Census tract 45083022201 in the Southern Pines neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 45083022201?
Median gross rent is $1,132/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 45083022201?
15.4% of residents in tract 45083022201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,385.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 45083022201?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 75th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 75th, household 87th, minority 36th, housing 57th.
Q5
Is tract 45083022201 considered part of Southern Pines?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45083022201 fall within Southern Pines (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45083022201?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 140 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 45083022201 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 26.27% of renter households, peaking at 26.3% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 45083022201 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 45083022201 compare to Converse overall?
Tract 45083022201 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Converse at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Converse; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.