Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally
White Springs Eviction Risk: Lower , Pacolet
Tract 45083023901 · Spartanburg County, SC · pop 1,861 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Tract 45083023901, home to 1,861 residents in the White Springs area of Pacolet, scores 4.6/10 for landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #63,209 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
24% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $858 monthly, set against $82,997 in average yearly household income, roughly 12% of income at the averages. About 21% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 16%
Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units669
Renter share20.9%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate11.2%
Median income$82,997
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
40
th percentile
Low
Within state
49
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Pacolet and the region
Centroid at 34.8918, -81.8148 · click any tract to drill in
Why White Springs scores 3.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Pacolet
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
11.2% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$858 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pacolet
2.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pacolet
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pacolet
4.7
How White Springs compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 31
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 40%Socioeconomic
- 20%Household composition
- 42%Racial/ethnic minority
- 34%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.3%Housing insecurity
- 8.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 16.9%Food insecurity
- 10.8%SNAP enrollment
- 8.1%Transit barriers
- 11.2%No health insurance
- 16.4%Frequent mental distress
- 36.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in White Springs
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pacolet, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Spartanburg County average of 5.5 and below the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 31st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 12.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 45083023901
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45083023901?
Census tract 45083023901 in the White Springs neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 45083023901?
Median gross rent is $858/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 45083023901?
11.2% of residents in tract 45083023901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,861.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 45083023901?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 40th, household 20th, minority 42th, housing 34th.
Q5
Is tract 45083023901 considered part of White Springs?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45083023901 fall within White Springs (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 45083023901 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 45083023901 compare to Pacolet overall?
Tract 45083023901 scores 3.9/10, higher than the parent city of Pacolet at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pacolet; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Pacolet
Top eight tracts in Pacolet ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related