Neighborhood · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally
Fairlane Eviction Risk: Lower , Clarksville
Tract 47125101103 ·
Montgomery County, TN · pop 2,657 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Tract 47125101103 sits in the Fairlane area of Clarksville eviction risk, TN, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.4/10. It is home to 2,657 residents. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%Stable renters 17%Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units966
Renter share28.8%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate10.3%
Median income$71,000
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Fairlane
Moderate
Within parent city
44th percentile
#23 of 40 tracts In Clarksville
Moderate
Within county
49th percentile
#24 of 46 tracts In Montgomery County
Moderate
Within state
44th percentile
#960 of 1,701 tracts In Tennessee
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Clarksville and the region
Centroid at 36.5321, -87.4241 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fairlane scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Clarksville
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
10.3% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$927 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Clarksville
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Clarksville
2.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Clarksville
2.5
How Fairlane compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 53
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
65%Socioeconomic
81%Household composition
59%Racial/ethnic minority
14%Housing & transportation
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fairlane
Average gross rent is $927, 29% below the Clarksville average. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.9/10.
Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 2/10. 9% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the national scale it lands near the 29th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $71,000, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 39% of renters.
It tracks the Montgomery County average of 3.7 closely. 29% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 47125101103
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47125101103?
Census tract 47125101103 in the Fairlane neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 47125101103?
Median gross rent is $927/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 47125101103?
10.3% of residents in tract 47125101103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,657.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 47125101103?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 81th, minority 59th, housing 14th.
Q5
Is tract 47125101103 considered part of Fairlane?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 47125101103 fall within Fairlane (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How does tract 47125101103 compare to Clarksville overall?
Tract 47125101103 scores 3.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Clarksville at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Clarksville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Clarksville
Top eight tracts in Clarksville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.