Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally
Shackle Island Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 47165021006 · Sumner County, TN · pop 4,555 · 40% of tract blocks fall in Shackle Island
For landlords sizing up Shackle Island, census tract 47165021006 carries a lower eviction-risk score of $1/10. That is riskier than roughly 2% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 14% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $129,828 a year. About 6% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.7
Lower
Confidence 70% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 5%
Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units1,262
Renter share6.1%
SVI overall0.16
Poverty rate9.5%
Median income$129,828
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
12
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
6
th percentile
Very Low
National
8
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Shackle Island and the region
Centroid at 36.3992, -86.6091 · click any tract to drill in
Why Shackle Island scores 1.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Shackle Island
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
9.5% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Shackle Island
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Shackle Island
2.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Shackle Island
1.1
How Shackle Island compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 16
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 23%Socioeconomic
- 17%Household composition
- 24%Racial/ethnic minority
- 26%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Shackle Island
The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Shackle Island, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Sumner County average of 4.3 and below the Tennessee statewide average of 4.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 16th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 47165021006
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47165021006?
Census tract 47165021006 in Shackle Island scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 47165021006?
9.5% of residents in tract 47165021006 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,555.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 47165021006?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 16th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 17th, minority 24th, housing 26th.
Q4
How does tract 47165021006 compare to Shackle Island overall?
Tract 47165021006 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Shackle Island at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Shackle Island; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related