Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally

Grey Forest Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48029182103 · Bexar, TX · pop 5,149 · 5% of tract blocks fall in Grey Forest

How risky is Grey Forest for landlords? Census tract 48029182103 scores 4.7/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 28% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 39% of renter households, a high level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,500 monthly, set against $152,452 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 3% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 2% Owners 97%
Tract context
Occupied units1,729
Renter share2.7%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate1.2%
Median income$152,452

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Grey Forest
Moderate
Within county
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#371 of 375 tracts In Bexar
Very Low
Within state
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#6,584 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very Low
National
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#81,634 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Grey Forest and the region

Centroid at 29.6667, -98.7363 · click any tract to drill in

Why Grey Forest scores 1.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Grey Forest
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
1.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,500 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Grey Forest
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Grey Forest
2.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Grey Forest
1.9

How Grey Forest compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Grey Forest risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.21.2This tracttract 182103Grey Forest: 1.91.9Grey Forestparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 21

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 17Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 0.00%Avg annual filing rate
  • 0.0%Peak (2005)
  • 2Filings in 2008 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2008
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 480291821032000: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2001: 2 filings (3.03/100 renter HHs)2002: 2 filings (3.03/100 renter HHs)2003: 3 filings (4.55/100 renter HHs)2004: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2005: 4 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2006: 2 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2007: 2 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2008: 2 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Grey Forest

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Grey Forest, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Bexar County average of 5.2 and in line with the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 21st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 17 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at of renter households in 2005.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48029182103

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48029182103?

Census tract 48029182103 in Grey Forest scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48029182103?

Median gross rent is $2,500/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48029182103?

1.2% of residents in tract 48029182103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,149.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48029182103?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 93th, minority 62th, housing 2th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48029182103?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 17 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 48029182103 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.00% of renter households, peaking at 0.0% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 48029182103 compare to Grey Forest overall?

Tract 48029182103 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Grey Forest at 1.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Grey Forest; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related