Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,265 of 84,120 nationally

Kashmere Gardens Eviction Risk: Lower , Houston

Tract 48201211200 · Harris, TX · pop 2,207 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Here is how census tract 48201211200, in Kashmere Gardens in Houston eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 5.9/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 2,207. That is riskier than roughly 70% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

63% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 40% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $923 monthly, set against $22,982 in average yearly household income, roughly 48% of income at the averages. Renters make up 65% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1-10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 41% Stable renters 24% Owners 35%
Tract context
Occupied units1,110
Renter share64.9%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate39.4%
Median income$22,982

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileBottomTop
#2 of 6 tracts In Kashmere Gardens
High
Within parent city
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileBottomTop
#52 of 952 tracts In Houston
Very High
Within county
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileBottomTop
#107 of 1,115 tracts In Harris
Very High
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileBottomTop
#807 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Houston and the region

Centroid at 29.7982, -95.3204 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kashmere Gardens scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Houston
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
39.4% poverty · this tract
9.8
Supply constraint
$923 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Houston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Houston
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Houston
2.5

How Kashmere Gardens compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kashmere Gardens risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 211200Houston: 2.72.7Houstonparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 99

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000-2018)

  • 667Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 18.61%Avg annual filing rate
  • 29.0%Peak (2015)
  • 143Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 482012112002009: 69 filings (12.37/100 renter HHs)2010: 63 filings (9.59/100 renter HHs)2011: 70 filings (14.17/100 renter HHs)2012: 64 filings (12.96/100 renter HHs)2013: 123 filings (24.90/100 renter HHs)2014: 135 filings (27.33/100 renter HHs)2015: 143 filings (28.95/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 107% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020-2021)

  • 566Total filings 2020-21
  • 7.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 9.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.79×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020-2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 12 filings (1.07× baseline)2020-02-01: 12 filings (1.60× baseline)2020-03-01: 6 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 16 filings (1.07× baseline)2020-07-01: 8 filings (1.07× baseline)2020-08-01: 6 filings (0.38× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (0.16× baseline)2020-10-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (0.43× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-02-01: 8 filings (1.07× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2021-04-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 5 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-08-01: 5 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-09-01: 7 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (0.52× baseline)2021-11-01: 8 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (0.29× baseline)2022-01-01: 11 filings (0.98× baseline)2022-02-01: 22 filings (2.93× baseline)2022-03-01: 13 filings (1.93× baseline)2022-04-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2022-05-01: 10 filings (1.08× baseline)2022-06-01: 5 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-07-01: 11 filings (1.47× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (0.31× baseline)2022-09-01: 10 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-10-01: 7 filings (0.90× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2022-12-01: 19 filings (1.81× baseline)2023-01-01: 12 filings (1.07× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (0.59× baseline)2023-04-01: 9 filings (1.38× baseline)2023-05-01: 4 filings (0.43× baseline)2023-06-01: 11 filings (0.73× baseline)2023-07-01: 12 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-08-01: 7 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (0.16× baseline)2023-10-01: 10 filings (1.29× baseline)2023-11-01: 10 filings (1.08× baseline)2023-12-01: 8 filings (0.76× baseline)2024-01-01: 10 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-02-01: 9 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-03-01: 8 filings (1.19× baseline)2024-04-01: 12 filings (1.85× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (0.65× baseline)2024-06-01: 9 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-07-01: 9 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-08-01: 8 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-10-01: 6 filings (0.77× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (0.48× baseline)2025-01-01: 16 filings (1.42× baseline)2025-02-01: 4 filings (0.53× baseline)2025-03-01: 9 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-04-01: 12 filings (1.85× baseline)2025-05-01: 10 filings (1.08× baseline)2025-06-01: 8 filings (0.53× baseline)2025-07-01: 8 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-08-01: 5 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-09-01: 13 filings (1.04× baseline)2025-10-01: 10 filings (1.29× baseline)2025-11-01: 11 filings (1.19× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (0.29× baseline)2026-01-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Houston, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Kashmere Gardens. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kashmere Gardens

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 9.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Houston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Harris County average of 5.2 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 99th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 667 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 18.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 29.0% of renter households in 2015.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48201211200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48201211200?

Census tract 48201211200 in the Kashmere Gardens neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48201211200?

Median gross rent is $923/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48201211200?

39.4% of residents in tract 48201211200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,207.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48201211200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 100th, household 78th, minority 100th, housing 95th.

Q5

Is tract 48201211200 considered part of Kashmere Gardens?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48201211200 fall within Kashmere Gardens (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).

Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48201211200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 667 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 48201211200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 18.61% of renter households, peaking at 29.0% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48201211200 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.79× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Houston eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.

Q8

How does tract 48201211200 compare to Houston overall?

Tract 48201211200 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Houston at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Houston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Q9

Was tract 48201211200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 7% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Houston

Top eight tracts in Houston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related