Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,265 of 84,120 nationally

Kashmere Gardens Eviction Risk: Lower , Houston

Tract 48201211000 · Harris, TX · pop 1,813 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

How risky is the Kashmere Gardens area of Houston for landlords? Census tract 48201211000 scores 5.6/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 59% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

62% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 55% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $868 a month while the average household earns $31,667 a year, roughly 33% of income at the averages. Renters make up 45% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1-10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 17% Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units758
Renter share45.1%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate30.1%
Median income$31,667

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileBottomTop
#1 of 6 tracts In Kashmere Gardens
Very High
Within parent city
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileBottomTop
#100 of 952 tracts In Houston
High
Within county
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileBottomTop
#104 of 1,115 tracts In Harris
Very High
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileBottomTop
#807 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Houston and the region

Centroid at 29.7971, -95.3321 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kashmere Gardens scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Houston
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
30.1% poverty · this tract
7.5
Supply constraint
$868 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Houston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Houston
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Houston
2.5

How Kashmere Gardens compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kashmere Gardens risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 211000Houston: 2.72.7Houstonparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000-2018)

  • 234Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 8.04%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.3%Peak (2013)
  • 33Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 482012110002009: 23 filings (5.97/100 renter HHs)2010: 38 filings (7.98/100 renter HHs)2011: 27 filings (6.60/100 renter HHs)2012: 37 filings (9.05/100 renter HHs)2013: 42 filings (10.27/100 renter HHs)2014: 34 filings (8.31/100 renter HHs)2015: 33 filings (8.07/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 43% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020-2021)

  • 548Total filings 2020-21
  • 7.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.17×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020-2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (1.23× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-06-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-07-01: 9 filings (2.12× baseline)2021-08-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-12-01: 10 filings (5.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 4 filings (1.78× baseline)2022-03-01: 8 filings (2.13× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (2.22× baseline)2022-06-01: 9 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2022-09-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2022-10-01: 9 filings (2.77× baseline)2022-11-01: 16 filings (4.92× baseline)2022-12-01: 13 filings (6.50× baseline)2023-01-01: 8 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-02-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2023-04-01: 17 filings (5.23× baseline)2023-05-01: 16 filings (7.11× baseline)2023-06-01: 8 filings (1.78× baseline)2023-07-01: 11 filings (2.59× baseline)2023-08-01: 13 filings (2.74× baseline)2023-09-01: 12 filings (3.43× baseline)2023-10-01: 10 filings (3.08× baseline)2023-11-01: 19 filings (5.85× baseline)2023-12-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-04-01: 6 filings (1.85× baseline)2024-05-01: 8 filings (3.56× baseline)2024-06-01: 15 filings (3.33× baseline)2024-07-01: 10 filings (2.35× baseline)2024-08-01: 12 filings (2.53× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (1.71× baseline)2024-10-01: 12 filings (3.69× baseline)2024-11-01: 12 filings (3.69× baseline)2024-12-01: 11 filings (5.50× baseline)2025-01-01: 15 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 11 filings (4.89× baseline)2025-03-01: 7 filings (1.87× baseline)2025-04-01: 7 filings (2.15× baseline)2025-05-01: 14 filings (6.22× baseline)2025-06-01: 14 filings (3.11× baseline)2025-07-01: 12 filings (2.82× baseline)2025-08-01: 15 filings (3.16× baseline)2025-09-01: 14 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 18 filings (5.54× baseline)2025-11-01: 9 filings (2.77× baseline)2025-12-01: 9 filings (4.50× baseline)2026-01-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Houston, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Kashmere Gardens. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kashmere Gardens

What moves this score most is economic stress at 7.5/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Houston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Harris County average of 5.2 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 234 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 8.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 10.3% of renter households in 2013.

Part of this tract, about 6% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48201211000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48201211000?

Census tract 48201211000 in the Kashmere Gardens neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48201211000?

Median gross rent is $868/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48201211000?

30.1% of residents in tract 48201211000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,813.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48201211000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 98th, minority 97th, housing 73th.

Q5

Is tract 48201211000 considered part of Kashmere Gardens?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48201211000 fall within Kashmere Gardens (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).

Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48201211000?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 234 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 48201211000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.04% of renter households, peaking at 10.3% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48201211000 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.17× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Houston eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.

Q8

How does tract 48201211000 compare to Houston overall?

Tract 48201211000 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Houston at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Houston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Q9

Was tract 48201211000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 6% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Houston

Top eight tracts in Houston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related