Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,456 of 84,120 nationally

Canfield Oaks Eviction Risk: Elevated , Houston

Tract 48201312800 · Harris, TX · pop 3,291 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 48201312800, home to 3,291 residents in the Canfield Oaks area of Houston, scores 5.9/10 for landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #24,948 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 48% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $338 a month while the average household earns $14,000 a year, roughly 29% of income at the averages. Renters make up 87% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.5
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 42% Stable renters 45% Owners 13%
Tract context
Occupied units854
Renter share87.4%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate60.2%
Median income$14,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Canfield Oaks
Moderate
Within parent city
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 952 tracts In Houston
Very High
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 1,115 tracts In Harris
Very High
Within state
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#86 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Houston and the region

Centroid at 29.7220, -95.3579 · click any tract to drill in

Why Canfield Oaks scores 6.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Houston
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
60.2% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$338 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Houston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Houston
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Houston
2.5

How Canfield Oaks compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Canfield Oaks risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.56.5This tracttract 312800Houston: 2.82.8Houstonparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,044Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 24.90%Avg annual filing rate
  • 33.4%Peak (2011)
  • 110Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 482013128002009: 181 filings (21.65/100 renter HHs)2010: 186 filings (33.04/100 renter HHs)2011: 189 filings (33.39/100 renter HHs)2012: 147 filings (25.97/100 renter HHs)2013: 101 filings (17.84/100 renter HHs)2014: 130 filings (22.97/100 renter HHs)2015: 110 filings (19.43/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 39% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 229Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 9.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.32×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 15 filings (1.46× baseline)2020-02-01: 26 filings (1.82× baseline)2020-03-01: 5 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.07× baseline)2020-07-01: 7 filings (0.93× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 10 filings (0.78× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (0.28× baseline)2021-01-01: 11 filings (1.07× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.07× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (0.24× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.19× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.20× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (0.42× baseline)2022-03-01: 9 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2022-05-01: 15 filings (2.14× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.14× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.12× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.08× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (0.47× baseline)2023-01-01: 5 filings (0.49× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.08× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.14× baseline)2023-07-01: 17 filings (2.27× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (0.24× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (0.31× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (0.47× baseline)2024-01-01: 6 filings (0.59× baseline)2024-02-01: 11 filings (0.77× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.29× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.14× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.06× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.08× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.14× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.12× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Houston, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Canfield Oaks

The score leans hardest on economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Houston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Harris County average of 5.2 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.32x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 8% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48201312800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48201312800?

Census tract 48201312800 in the Canfield Oaks neighborhood scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48201312800?

Median gross rent is $338/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48201312800?

60.2% of residents in tract 48201312800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,291.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48201312800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 66th, minority 93th, housing 97th.
Q5

Is tract 48201312800 considered part of Canfield Oaks?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48201312800 fall within Canfield Oaks (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48201312800?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,044 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 48201312800 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 24.90% of renter households, peaking at 33.4% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48201312800 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.32× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Houston eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48201312800 compare to Houston overall?

Tract 48201312800 scores 6.5/10, higher than the parent city of Houston at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Houston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 48201312800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 8% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Houston

Top eight tracts in Houston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related