Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #10,885 of 84,120 nationally

Meadowbrook Eviction Risk: Elevated , Houston

Tract 48201320201 · Harris, TX · pop 2,876 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

With a score of $1/10, tract 48201320201 in the Meadowbrook area of Houston ranks in the Elevated tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 2,876 residents. On the national scale it ranks #22,202 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 64% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 62% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,188 a month against an average household income of $41,863 a year, roughly 34% of income at the averages. About 57% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 37% Stable renters 21% Owners 42%
Tract context
Occupied units799
Renter share57.4%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate41.0%
Median income$41,863

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 8 tracts In Meadowbrook
High
Within parent city
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#145 of 952 tracts In Houston
High
Within county
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#140 of 1,115 tracts In Harris
High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#525 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Houston and the region

Centroid at 29.7009, -95.2681 · click any tract to drill in

Why Meadowbrook scores 6.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Houston
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
41.0% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$1,188 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Houston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Houston
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Houston
2.5

How Meadowbrook compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Meadowbrook risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.16.1This tracttract 320201Houston: 2.82.8Houstonparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 93

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 360Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 4.29×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 9 filings (9.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 8 filings (3.20× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 6 filings (3.43× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 9 filings (6.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2022-01-01: 6 filings (3.43× baseline)2022-02-01: 7 filings (7.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 5 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 7 filings (9.33× baseline)2022-06-01: 9 filings (9.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 9 filings (12.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (3.43× baseline)2022-10-01: 9 filings (9.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2023-01-01: 6 filings (3.43× baseline)2023-02-01: 9 filings (9.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 8 filings (16.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 7 filings (9.33× baseline)2023-06-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (6.67× baseline)2023-08-01: 6 filings (2.40× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (2.86× baseline)2023-10-01: 9 filings (9.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 15 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 6 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 8 filings (16.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 17 filings (22.67× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 7 filings (9.33× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2024-10-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 7 filings (4.67× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (3.33× baseline)2025-01-01: 7 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 8 filings (8.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 5 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (8.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 9 filings (3.60× baseline)2025-09-01: 8 filings (4.57× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Houston, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Meadowbrook. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Meadowbrook

The score leans hardest on economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Houston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Harris County average of 5.2 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 93rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 4.29x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 48201320201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48201320201?

Census tract 48201320201 in the Meadowbrook neighborhood scores 6.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48201320201?

Median gross rent is $1,188/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48201320201?

41.0% of residents in tract 48201320201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,876.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48201320201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 66th, minority 95th, housing 82th.
Q5

Is tract 48201320201 considered part of Meadowbrook?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48201320201 fall within Meadowbrook (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48201320201 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 4.29× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Houston eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48201320201 compare to Houston overall?

Tract 48201320201 scores 6.1/10, higher than the parent city of Houston at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Houston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 48201320201 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Houston

Top eight tracts in Houston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related