Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,850 of 84,120 nationally

Park Place Eviction Risk: Moderate , Deer Park

Tract 48201332900 · Harris, TX · pop 4,953 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 48201332900 (the Park Place area of Deer Park, Texas) comes in at 5.5/10, the Moderate tier. On the national scale it ranks #37,442 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

69% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 30% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,067 monthly, set against $49,125 in average yearly household income, roughly 26% of income at the averages. Renters make up 50% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 34% Stable renters 16% Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units1,471
Renter share50.3%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate23.5%
Median income$49,125

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Park Place
Very High
Within parent city
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#244 of 952 tracts In Deer Park
Elevated
Within county
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#269 of 1,115 tracts In Harris
High
Within state
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#1,099 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Deer Park and the region

Centroid at 29.6904, -95.2905 · click any tract to drill in

Why Park Place scores 5.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Deer Park
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
23.5% poverty · this tract
5.9
Supply constraint
$1,067 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Deer Park
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Deer Park
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Deer Park
2.5

How Park Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Park Place risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.65.6This tracttract 332900Deer Park: 2.32.3Deer Parkparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 178Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 3.66%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.0%Peak (2010)
  • 26Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 482013329002009: 22 filings (2.58/100 renter HHs)2010: 33 filings (4.98/100 renter HHs)2011: 18 filings (2.64/100 renter HHs)2012: 24 filings (3.52/100 renter HHs)2013: 32 filings (4.69/100 renter HHs)2014: 23 filings (3.37/100 renter HHs)2015: 26 filings (3.81/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 18% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 382Total filings 2020-21
  • 5.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.38×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 7 filings (2.55× baseline)2020-02-01: 10 filings (6.67× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 5 filings (1.54× baseline)2020-07-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-10-01: 5 filings (2.86× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (1.82× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-09-01: 10 filings (5.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-03-01: 8 filings (2.91× baseline)2022-04-01: 6 filings (2.40× baseline)2022-05-01: 9 filings (6.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 12 filings (3.69× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (3.33× baseline)2022-09-01: 10 filings (5.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (2.86× baseline)2022-11-01: 10 filings (5.71× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (3.33× baseline)2023-01-01: 8 filings (2.91× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (3.33× baseline)2023-03-01: 6 filings (2.18× baseline)2023-04-01: 7 filings (2.80× baseline)2023-05-01: 9 filings (6.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 10 filings (3.08× baseline)2023-07-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-08-01: 15 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 10 filings (5.71× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-12-01: 10 filings (6.67× baseline)2024-01-01: 9 filings (3.27× baseline)2024-02-01: 7 filings (4.67× baseline)2024-03-01: 8 filings (2.91× baseline)2024-04-01: 6 filings (2.40× baseline)2024-05-01: 12 filings (8.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (1.23× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-10-01: 11 filings (6.29× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2024-12-01: 7 filings (4.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 5 filings (1.82× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (3.33× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-08-01: 11 filings (7.33× baseline)2025-09-01: 9 filings (4.50× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Houston, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Park Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Park Place

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 5.9/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Deer Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Harris County average of 5.2 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 98th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48201332900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48201332900?

Census tract 48201332900 in the Park Place neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48201332900?

Median gross rent is $1,067/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48201332900?

23.5% of residents in tract 48201332900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,953.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48201332900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 94th, minority 95th, housing 89th.
Q5

Is tract 48201332900 considered part of Park Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48201332900 fall within Park Place (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48201332900?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 178 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 48201332900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.66% of renter households, peaking at 5.0% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48201332900 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.38× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Houston eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48201332900 compare to Deer Park overall?

Tract 48201332900 scores 5.6/10, higher than the parent city of Deer Park at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Deer Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 48201332900 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Deer Park

Top eight tracts in Deer Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related