Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally

Tract 48473680601 Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 48473680601 · Waller, TX · pop 2,490

Census tract 48473680601 belongs to Waller, Texas. It is home to 2,490 residents and scores 4.3/10, a moderate reading for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 17% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 62% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,125 a month while the average household earns $114,728 a year, roughly 12% of income at the averages. Renters make up 4% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 1% Owners 97%
Tract context
Occupied units951
Renter share3.9%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate3.2%
Median income$114,728

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 11 tracts In Waller
Very Low
Within state
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#5,697 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very Low
National
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#69,776 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Waller and the region

Centroid at 30.1298, -95.8490 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tract 48473680601 scores 2.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
1.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.7
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,125 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
State baseline
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0

How Tract 48473680601 compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tract 48473680601 risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.32.3This tracttract 680601County: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 38

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tract 48473680601

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by Texas eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Waller County average of 4.6 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 38th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48473680601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48473680601?

Census tract 48473680601 in Waller scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48473680601?

Median gross rent is $1,125/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48473680601?

3.2% of residents in tract 48473680601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,490.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48473680601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 57th, minority 29th, housing 24th.
Related