Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally

Cedar Bluffs Eviction Risk: Lower , North Logan

Tract 49005000402 · Cache, UT · pop 4,346 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 49005000402 runs through the Cedar Bluffs area of North Logan. With 4,346 residents, it scores 2.9/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 1% of US census tracts.

0% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $965 a month while the average household earns $130,694 a year, roughly 9% of income at the averages. Renters make up 4% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 4% Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units1,325
Renter share4.0%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate5.4%
Median income$130,694

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Cedar Bluffs
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In North Logan
Very Low
Within county
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 28 tracts In Cache
Low
Within state
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#282 of 716 tracts In Utah
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across North Logan and the region

Centroid at 41.7905, -111.7878 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cedar Bluffs scores 2.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from North Logan
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
5.4% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$965 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from North Logan
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North Logan
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from North Logan
7.5

How Cedar Bluffs compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cedar Bluffs risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.62.6This tracttract 000402North Logan: 2.22.2North Loganparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 10Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 1.42%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.0%Peak (2011)
  • 2Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2006 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 490050004022006: 1 filings (1.10/100 renter HHs)2007: 1 filings (1.10/100 renter HHs)2008: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2009: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2011: 2 filings (2.00/100 renter HHs)2012: 2 filings (2.00/100 renter HHs)2014: 1 filings (1.00/100 renter HHs)2015: 1 filings (1.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 2 filings (1.74/100 renter HHs)2017: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2018: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 100% over the past 11 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cedar Bluffs

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from North Logan eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Cache County average of 3.6 and below the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 10 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 1.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.0% of renter households in 2011.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 1st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 49005000402

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49005000402?

Census tract 49005000402 in the Cedar Bluffs neighborhood scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49005000402?

Median gross rent is $965/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49005000402?

5.4% of residents in tract 49005000402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,346.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49005000402?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 6th, minority 2th, housing 4th.
Q5

Is tract 49005000402 considered part of Cedar Bluffs?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49005000402 fall within Cedar Bluffs (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49005000402?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 10 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 49005000402 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.42% of renter households, peaking at 2.0% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 49005000402 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 49005000402 compare to North Logan overall?

Tract 49005000402 scores 2.6/10, higher than the parent city of North Logan at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North Logan eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in North Logan

Top eight tracts in North Logan ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related