Skip to content
North Logan, Utah eviction risk overview
City brief · 11,460 residents

North Logan, UT Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Cache County · Population 11,460

In 2026
Risk score
2.2
VERY LOW

77th percentile, Utah.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.5 Average1.8 Now2.2
2.4 1.5 1976 · score 1.8 1977 · score 1.8 1978 · score 1.7 1979 · score 1.8 1980 · score 1.9 1981 · score 1.9 1982 · score 2.0 1983 · score 2.0 1984 · score 1.9 1985 · score 1.9 1986 · score 1.9 1987 · score 1.9 1988 · score 1.8 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.5 1991 · score 1.5 1992 · score 1.6 1993 · score 1.6 1994 · score 1.6 1995 · score 1.6 1996 · score 1.5 1997 · score 1.5 1998 · score 1.6 1999 · score 1.6 2000 · score 1.5 2001 · score 1.6 2002 · score 1.7 2003 · score 1.6 2004 · score 1.6 2005 · score 1.6 2006 · score 1.5 2007 · score 1.5 2008 · score 1.6 2009 · score 1.9 2010 · score 1.9 2011 · score 1.9 2012 · score 1.7 2013 · score 1.7 2014 · score 1.7 2015 · score 1.7 2016 · score 2.1 2017 · score 2.1 2018 · score 2.1 2019 · score 2.2 2020 · score 2.4 2021 · score 2.2 2022 · score 2.2 2023 · score 2.2 2024 · score 2.2 2025 · score 2.2 2026 · score 2.2

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.8 Regional 3.8 State 1.9 Economic 5.5 Supply 8.5 Rent Control 8.1 Eviction 2.1 Tenant 8.4 Housing 7.5 2.2 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +34.4% (2024)
    3.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.8
  3. State political climate
    Utah legislature & governorship
    1.9
  4. Economic stress
    15.0% poverty · 2.2% unemp.
    5.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,658 average · 40.3% renters
    8.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    33.9% of income on rent
    8.1
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    26 days filing → judgment
    2.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    40.3% renters
    8.4
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across North Logan and the region

Click any city to see its score

How North Logan compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Cache County
High
#5 of 33 cities
Rank in county, 88th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 33 cities in Cache County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Utah
Elevated
#98 of 333 cities
Rank in state, 71st percentileLowHigh
#98 of 333 cities in Utah for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
North Logan risk score vs. county / state / U.S.North Logan: 2.22.2North LoganThis cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg in countyState: 2.22.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.2
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 26d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,658/mo. A contested eviction takes 26 days and costs $1,033–$2,395 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 40.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 11,460 residents, 40.3% rent. 34% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 15.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.8
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.8 and 3.8 (GOP margin +34.4% (2024)). State climate at 1.9, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.9
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.9/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.1, housing court bias 7.5, rent-control risk 8.1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.5. Supply constraint: 8.5. The numbers behind those: 15.0% poverty, 2.2% unemployment, 34% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

North Logan sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Ogden, UT · 25d · ~$1.7k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.7 Ogden Layton, UT · 25d · ~$1.7k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.1 Layton Logan, UT · 25d · ~$1.8k all-in ($72/day) · score 2.2 Logan Salt Lake City, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.9 Salt Lake City West Valley City, UT · 25d · ~$1.8k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.6 West Valley City West Jordan, UT · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.3 West Jordan Provo, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.2 Provo St. George, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 2.1 St. George Orem, UT · 24d · ~$1.9k all-in ($79/day) · score 2.2 Orem Sandy, UT · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.1 Sandy Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle North Logan
North Logan · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in North Logan, UT

Landlording in North Logan, Utah, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

North Logan is a city of 11,460 residents where 40.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 33.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,658/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How North Logan eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in North Logan closes 26 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of North Logan's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in North Logan runs $1,033 to $2,395 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 26 days of typical timeline and $1,658/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8.4/10 in North Logan, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (8.1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Utah, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in North Logan: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Utah's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,395 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in North Logan

Trap · 8.1/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. North Logan's 4/10 is below the Utah state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 8.1/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is the biggest eviction risk for landlords in North Logan?

The biggest practical risk in North Logan isn't necessarily the process difficulty, which is low (2.1/10), but rather the potential for lost rent and the time involved. While Utah's process is relatively fast (26 days average), a month of missed rent at $1,658 is a significant hit. The dataset also flags higher housing court bias (7.5/10) and tenant organizing strength (8.4/10), which means while rare, a tenant who knows how to work the system can drag things out.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant for any reason in North Logan?

No, not "any" reason. You need a legally valid reason, such as non-payment of rent, lease violations, or the expiration of a lease term. While Utah doesn't have statewide just-cause requirements for lease termination, your reason can't be discriminatory or retaliatory. Always stick to the terms of your lease and Utah law. For example, you can't evict a tenant for complaining about a legitimate maintenance issue.

Q3

How long do I have to return a security deposit in North Logan?

You have 30 days after the tenant moves out to either return the full security deposit or provide an itemized statement of deductions. If you miss this deadline, you could be liable for the full deposit amount, even if you had legitimate reasons for deductions. Keep meticulous records of any damage. Read up on Utah security deposit rules.

Q4

Do I need an attorney to evict a tenant in North Logan?

You are not legally required to have an attorney for an eviction in Utah. However, it's strongly recommended, especially if the tenant contests the eviction or you're unsure about the process. A single mistake in serving notice or filing paperwork can lead to your case being dismissed, forcing you to start over and costing you more time and money. For serious issues, a good local attorney is worth the investment.

Q5

Does North Logan have rent control?

No, North Logan does not have rent control. Utah has a statewide prohibition on rent control, meaning landlords are generally free to set market rates and raise rents according to the terms of the lease and proper notice. The rent-control-risk sub-score for North Logan is 8.1/10, indicating a high risk of future rent control legislation at the state level, but currently, it is not an issue. Stay informed on Utah rent control rules.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.2/10 places North Logan in the 77th percentile of Utah cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.