Marmalade District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Salt Lake City
Tract 49035100700 · Salt Lake, UT · pop 2,773 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi
Tract 49035100700 sits in the Marmalade District area of Salt Lake City eviction risk, UT, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.2/10. Population here is 2,773. Severe burden reaches 32%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Salt Lake City and the region
Centroid at 40.7813, -111.8947 · click any tract to drill in
Why Marmalade District scores 5.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Marmalade District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 29
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 40%Socioeconomic
- 2%Household composition
- 43%Racial/ethnic minority
- 69%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 8%Grade B
- 64%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 177Total filings over 9 yrs
- 2.27%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.0%Peak (2010)
- 10Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Marmalade District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.3%Housing insecurity
- 6.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.4%Food insecurity
- 5.8%SNAP enrollment
- 7.1%Transit barriers
- 9.7%No health insurance
- 18.4%Frequent mental distress
- 25.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Marmalade District
The clearest offset is state political climate at 1.9/10. It sits 1.4 points above the Salt Lake County average of 3.8.
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.5/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.5/10. SNAP participation runs 5.8% against 15.2% nationally.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 177 filings here across 9 tracked years. The worst year on record was 2010, when 3.0% of renter households were served.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Salt Lake City. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 2.3% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 65% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.6/10.
Statewide the UT average is 3.7, so this tract runs 1.5 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Rent takes 30% or more of income for 45% of renters. Average gross rent is $1,317, close to the Salt Lake City average.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 49035100700
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49035100700?
What is the average rent in tract 49035100700?
What is the poverty rate in tract 49035100700?
How socially vulnerable is tract 49035100700?
Is tract 49035100700 considered part of Marmalade District?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49035100700?
What share of households in tract 49035100700 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 49035100700 compare to Salt Lake City overall?
Was tract 49035100700 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Salt Lake City
Top eight tracts in Salt Lake City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.