Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,669 of 84,120 nationally
Sugar House Eviction Risk: Moderate , Salt Lake City
Tract 49035103300 · Salt Lake, UT · pop 4,319 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
49035103300 is a census tract in the Sugar House area of Salt Lake City, UT. It scores 4.8/10 for landlords. Population here is 4,319. Severe burden reaches 23%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25%
Stable renters 40%
Owners 35%
Tract context
Occupied units2,162
Renter share64.3%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate11.3%
Median income$80,211
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
48
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
79
th percentile
High
Within state
89
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Salt Lake City and the region
Centroid at 40.7295, -111.8625 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sugar House scores 4.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Salt Lake City
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
11.3% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,272 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Salt Lake City
3.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Salt Lake City
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Salt Lake City
5.0
How Sugar House compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 39
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 34%Socioeconomic
- 4%Household composition
- 38%Racial/ethnic minority
- 89%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 94%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 117Total filings over 9 yrs
- 1.12%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.7%Peak (2011)
- 9Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 36% over the past 9 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Sugar House. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.6%Housing insecurity
- 5.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.4%Food insecurity
- 4.6%SNAP enrollment
- 6.3%Transit barriers
- 8.0%No health insurance
- 18.2%Frequent mental distress
- 24.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Sugar House
Pulling hardest the other way is state political climate at 1.9/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.3/10.
SNAP participation runs 4.6% against 15.2% nationally. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.5/10. It sits 1.0 points above the Salt Lake County average of 3.8.
Court records carry 117 eviction filings across 9 observed years. Food insecurity runs 10.4% against 17.8% nationally.
Average gross rent is $1,272, 10% below the Salt Lake City average. Filings peaked in 2011 at 1.7% of renter households.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 1.1% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 58th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Social vulnerability reads 4.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 49035103300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49035103300?
Census tract 49035103300 in the Sugar House neighborhood scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49035103300?
Median gross rent is $1,272/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49035103300?
11.3% of residents in tract 49035103300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,319.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49035103300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 34th, household 4th, minority 38th, housing 89th.
Q5
Is tract 49035103300 considered part of Sugar House?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49035103300 fall within Sugar House (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49035103300?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 117 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 49035103300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.12% of renter households, peaking at 1.7% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 49035103300 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 49035103300 compare to Salt Lake City overall?
Tract 49035103300 scores 4.8/10, higher than the parent city of Salt Lake City at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Salt Lake City eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 49035103300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Salt Lake City
Top eight tracts in Salt Lake City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · UT
Marmalade District
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · UT
Granary District
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · UT
Poplar Grove
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · UT
Poplar Grove
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · UT
The Avenues
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · UT
Poplar Grove
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · UT
Yalecrest
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · UT
Glendale
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Related