Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,278 of 84,120 nationally

Tingleys Addition Eviction Risk: Moderate , Murray

Tract 49035111905 · Salt Lake, UT · pop 4,464 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

49035111905 is a census tract in the Tingleys Addition area of Murray, UT. It scores 4.9/10 for landlords. 26% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18% Stable renters 39% Owners 43%
Tract context
Occupied units1,802
Renter share57.3%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate14.6%
Median income$74,907

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 6 tracts In Tingleys Addition
Moderate
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 13 tracts In Murray
High
Within county
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#43 of 251 tracts In Salt Lake
High
Within state
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#72 of 716 tracts In Utah
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Murray and the region

Centroid at 40.6767, -111.8745 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tingleys Addition scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Murray
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
14.6% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,361 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Murray
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Murray
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Murray
4.6

How Tingleys Addition compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tingleys Addition risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.9This tracttract 1119053.7Murrayparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 77

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 326Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 3.58%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.1%Peak (2008)
  • 17Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2008 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 49035111905
Filings dropped 67% over the past 9 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Tingleys Addition. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tingleys Addition

The clearest offset is eviction-process difficulty at 1.3/10. around a third of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Salt Lake County average of 42.4%. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.9/10.

It sits 1.1 points above the Salt Lake County average of 3.8. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.3/10.

SNAP participation runs 6.6% against 15.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 326 filings here across 9 tracked years. Average gross rent is $1,361, 9% below the Murray average.

The worst year on record was 2008, when 4.1% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 3.6% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 59th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 7.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the UT average is 3.7, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $74,907.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 49035111905

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49035111905?

Census tract 49035111905 in the Tingleys Addition neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49035111905?

Median gross rent is $1,361/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49035111905?

14.6% of residents in tract 49035111905 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,464.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49035111905?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 88th, minority 49th, housing 69th.
Q5

Is tract 49035111905 considered part of Tingleys Addition?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49035111905 fall within Tingleys Addition (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49035111905?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 326 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 49035111905 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.58% of renter households, peaking at 4.1% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 49035111905 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 49035111905 compare to Murray overall?

Tract 49035111905 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Murray at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Murray eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Murray

Top eight tracts in Murray ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related