Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,239 of 84,120 nationally

Tingleys Addition Eviction Risk: Moderate , Murray

Tract 49035112002 · Salt Lake, UT · pop 4,603 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 49035112002 covers part of the Tingleys Addition area of Murray, UT, and scores 4.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,603 residents. Pulling hardest the other way is eviction-process difficulty at 1.3/10.

Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 24% Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units2,138
Renter share47.6%
SVI overall0.46
Poverty rate5.5%
Median income$62,151

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Tingleys Addition
Low
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 13 tracts In Murray
Elevated
Within county
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#77 of 251 tracts In Salt Lake
Elevated
Within state
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#172 of 716 tracts In Utah
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Murray and the region

Centroid at 40.6568, -111.8745 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tingleys Addition scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Murray
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
5.5% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,364 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Murray
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Murray
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Murray
4.6

How Tingleys Addition compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tingleys Addition risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.3This tracttract 1120023.7Murrayparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 46

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 338Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 3.69%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.3%Peak (2010)
  • 36Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2008 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 49035112002
Filings climbed 20% over the past 9 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Tingleys Addition. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tingleys Addition

The severe-burden share is 23%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.4/10.

On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.9/10. Against Salt Lake County at 42.4%, 49% of renters here are cost-burdened. SNAP participation runs 4.9% against 15.2% nationally.

Court records carry 338 eviction filings across 9 observed years. Average gross rent is $1,364, 9% below the Murray average.

Filings peaked in 2010 at 5.3% of renter households. In a typical year about 3.7% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 47th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 49035112002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49035112002?

Census tract 49035112002 in the Tingleys Addition neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49035112002?

Median gross rent is $1,364/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49035112002?

5.5% of residents in tract 49035112002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,603.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49035112002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 46th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 50th, household 18th, minority 36th, housing 67th.
Q5

Is tract 49035112002 considered part of Tingleys Addition?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49035112002 fall within Tingleys Addition (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49035112002?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 338 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 49035112002 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.69% of renter households, peaking at 5.3% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 49035112002 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 49035112002 compare to Murray overall?

Tract 49035112002 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of Murray at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Murray eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Murray

Top eight tracts in Murray ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related