Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Leeds Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49053270101 · Washington, UT · pop 4,592 · 16% of tract blocks fall in Leeds
49053270101 is a census tract in Leeds, UT. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Population here is 4,592. Cost burden runs 17% here against 49.4% across Washington County.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%
Stable renters 11%
Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,733
Renter share12.8%
SVI overall0.32
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$81,336
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
41
th percentile
Moderate
National
20
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Leeds and the region
Centroid at 37.3646, -113.3099 · click any tract to drill in
Why Leeds scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Leeds
3.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.4
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,236 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Leeds
1.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Leeds
4.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Leeds
2.2
How Leeds compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 32
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 37%Socioeconomic
- 45%Household composition
- 15%Racial/ethnic minority
- 34%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.0%Housing insecurity
- 5.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.7%Food insecurity
- 5.2%SNAP enrollment
- 5.6%Transit barriers
- 8.2%No health insurance
- 14.7%Frequent mental distress
- 34.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Leeds
Pulling hardest the other way is court filing pressure at 1.3/10. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.4/10.
Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.4/10. SNAP participation runs 5.2% against 15.2% nationally.
Food insecurity runs 9.7% against 17.8% nationally. At $1,236 a month, rents run 13% under what the rest of Leeds commands. It sits 0.6 points below the Washington County average of 3.6.
On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 13% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Annual rent works out to 18% of average household income of $81,336.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 49053270101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49053270101?
Census tract 49053270101 in Leeds scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49053270101?
Median gross rent is $1,236/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 17% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49053270101?
7.1% of residents in tract 49053270101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,592.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49053270101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 32th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 45th, minority 15th, housing 34th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 49053270101 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 49053270101 compare to Leeds overall?
Tract 49053270101 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Leeds at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Leeds; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related