Census Tract · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally
Huntsville Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49057210101 ·
Weber, UT · pop 3,630 · 20% of tract blocks fall in Huntsville
For landlords sizing up Huntsville in Weber County, census tract 49057210101 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.6/10. That is riskier than roughly 24% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 59% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,844 a month against an average household income of $143,870 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 11% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%Stable renters 4%Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,339
Renter share10.9%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate2.9%
Median income$143,870
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Huntsville
Moderate
Within county
2th percentile
#57 of 58 tracts In Weber
Very Low
Within state
12th percentile
#629 of 716 tracts In Utah
Very Low
National
3th percentile
#81,634 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Huntsville and the region
Centroid at 41.3056, -111.8805 · click any tract to drill in
Why Huntsville scores 1.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Huntsville
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.9
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
2.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,844 rent vs county FMR
7.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Huntsville
1.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Huntsville
5.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Huntsville
3.2
How Huntsville compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 6
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
6%Socioeconomic
8%Household composition
2%Racial/ethnic minority
35%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
6.1%Housing insecurity
4.2%Utility-shutoff threat
7.1%Food insecurity
3.1%SNAP enrollment
4.2%Transit barriers
5.5%No health insurance
14.9%Frequent mental distress
27.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Huntsville
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Huntsville, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Weber County average of 4.4 and above the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 6.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 6th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 49057210101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49057210101?
Census tract 49057210101 in Huntsville scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49057210101?
Median gross rent is $1,844/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49057210101?
2.9% of residents in tract 49057210101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,630.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49057210101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 8th, minority 2th, housing 35th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 49057210101 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 49057210101 compare to Huntsville overall?
Tract 49057210101 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Huntsville at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Huntsville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 49057210101 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.