Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Huntsville Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49057210101 ·
Weber, UT · pop 3,630 · 20% of tract blocks fall in Huntsville
49057210101 is a census tract in Huntsville, UT. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,630. 59% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Weber County average of 39.9%.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%Stable renters 4%Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,339
Renter share10.9%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate2.9%
Median income$143,870
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Huntsville
Moderate
Within county
25th percentile
#44 of 58 tracts In Weber
Low
Within state
41th percentile
#425 of 716 tracts In Utah
Moderate
National
20th percentile
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Huntsville and the region
Centroid at 41.3056, -111.8805 · click any tract to drill in
Why Huntsville scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Huntsville
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.9
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
2.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,844 rent vs county FMR
7.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Huntsville
1.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Huntsville
5.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Huntsville
3.2
How Huntsville compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 6
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
6%Socioeconomic
8%Household composition
2%Racial/ethnic minority
35%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
6.1%Housing insecurity
4.2%Utility-shutoff threat
7.1%Food insecurity
3.1%SNAP enrollment
4.2%Transit barriers
5.5%No health insurance
14.9%Frequent mental distress
27.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Huntsville
At $1,844 a month, rents run 58% over what the rest of Huntsville commands. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10.
Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.6/10. Severe burden reaches 18%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.9/10.
SNAP participation runs 3.1% against 15.2% nationally. The voucher gap is 20.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Food insecurity runs 7.1% against 17.8% nationally.
Against the Weber County average of 3.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.6 points. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Ogden. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 11% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 49057210101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49057210101?
Census tract 49057210101 in Huntsville scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49057210101?
Median gross rent is $1,844/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49057210101?
2.9% of residents in tract 49057210101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,630.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49057210101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 8th, minority 2th, housing 35th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 49057210101 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 49057210101 compare to Huntsville overall?
Tract 49057210101 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Huntsville at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Huntsville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 49057210101 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.