Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Wolf Creek Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49057210102 ·
Weber, UT · pop 4,656 · 20% of tract blocks fall in Wolf Creek
With a score of 3/10, tract 49057210102 in Wolf Creek, UT reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,656. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%Stable renters 6%Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units1,658
Renter share6.1%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate3.4%
Median income$122,750
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Wolf Creek
Moderate
Within county
23th percentile
#45 of 58 tracts In Weber
Low
Within state
41th percentile
#425 of 716 tracts In Utah
Moderate
National
20th percentile
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Wolf Creek and the region
Centroid at 41.3162, -111.6383 · click any tract to drill in
Why Wolf Creek scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Wolf Creek
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.9
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
3.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Wolf Creek
1.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Wolf Creek
3.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Wolf Creek
1.5
How Wolf Creek compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 10
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
6.5%Housing insecurity
4.4%Utility-shutoff threat
7.8%Food insecurity
3.4%SNAP enrollment
4.4%Transit barriers
5.8%No health insurance
15.6%Frequent mental distress
28.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Wolf Creek
Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.1/10. Running cool, housing-court posture reads 1.5/10.
SNAP participation runs 3.4% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 7.8% against 17.8% nationally.
It sits 0.6 points below the Weber County average of 3.6. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 6% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.9/10. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 49057210102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49057210102?
Census tract 49057210102 in Wolf Creek scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 49057210102?
3.4% of residents in tract 49057210102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,656.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 49057210102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 20th, minority 8th, housing 22th.
Q4
What share of households in tract 49057210102 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q5
How does tract 49057210102 compare to Wolf Creek overall?
Tract 49057210102 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Wolf Creek at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Wolf Creek; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.