Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally
Pleasant View Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49057210303 · Weber, UT · pop 7,930 · 54% of tract blocks fall in Pleasant View
How risky is Pleasant View for landlords? Census tract 49057210303 scores 5.2/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 44% of US census tracts.
93% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,616 a month while the average household earns $128,594 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 5% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 0%
Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units2,270
Renter share4.9%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate0.4%
Median income$128,594
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
4
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
12
th percentile
Very Low
National
3
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Pleasant View and the region
Centroid at 41.3395, -111.9882 · click any tract to drill in
Why Pleasant View scores 1.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Pleasant View
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.9
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
0.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,616 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pleasant View
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pleasant View
3.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pleasant View
5.6
How Pleasant View compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 4
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 17%Socioeconomic
- 11%Household composition
- 31%Racial/ethnic minority
- 4%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 14Total filings over 6 yrs
- 2.13%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.9%Peak (2015)
- 3Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.3%Housing insecurity
- 4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.6%Food insecurity
- 3.7%SNAP enrollment
- 4.8%Transit barriers
- 6.9%No health insurance
- 16.5%Frequent mental distress
- 28.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Pleasant View
The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pleasant View, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Weber County average of 4.4 and above the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 4th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 49057210303
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49057210303?
Census tract 49057210303 in Pleasant View scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49057210303?
Median gross rent is $2,616/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 93% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49057210303?
0.4% of residents in tract 49057210303 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,930.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49057210303?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 11th, minority 31th, housing 4th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49057210303?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 14 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 49057210303 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.13% of renter households, peaking at 2.9% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 49057210303 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 49057210303 compare to Pleasant View overall?
Tract 49057210303 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Pleasant View at 1.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pleasant View; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Pleasant View
Top eight tracts in Pleasant View ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related