Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally
Danby Village Historic District Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 50021964200 · Rutland County, VT · pop 1,414 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
50021964200 is a census tract in the Danby Village Historic District area of Danby, VT. It scores 3.6/10 for landlords. Against Rutland County at 42.0%, 18% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%
Stable renters 9%
Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units623
Renter share10.4%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate11.9%
Median income$56,058
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
32
th percentile
Low
Within state
33
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Danby and the region
Centroid at 43.3506, -72.9911 · click any tract to drill in
Why Danby Village Historic District scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Danby
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Vermont legislature & governorship
4.6
Economic stress
11.9% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$988 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Danby
4.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Danby
2.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Danby
3.7
How Danby Village Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 39
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 44%Socioeconomic
- 32%Household composition
- 2%Racial/ethnic minority
- 59%Housing & transportation
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Danby Village Historic District
The clearest offset is tenant-organizing strength at 2.4/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.9/10.
On the softer side, economic stress reads 3/10. That is riskier than roughly 33% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 10% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
Social vulnerability reads 4.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the VT average is 4.6, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler.
It tracks the Rutland County average of 4.1 closely. Average gross rent is $988, close to the Danby average.
Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $56,058.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 50021964200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 50021964200?
Census tract 50021964200 in the Danby Village Historic District neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 50021964200?
Median gross rent is $988/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 18% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 50021964200?
11.9% of residents in tract 50021964200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,414.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 50021964200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 32th, minority 2th, housing 59th.
Q5
Is tract 50021964200 considered part of Danby Village Historic District?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 50021964200 fall within Danby Village Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How does tract 50021964200 compare to Danby overall?
Tract 50021964200 scores 3.6/10, right in line with the parent city of Danby at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Danby; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related