Skip to content
Map of Rutland County, VT eviction risk by city, county average 5.5 out of 10
County brief·Updated July 26, 2026

Rutland County, Vermont Eviction Risk: Moderate

20 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Rutland (5.2) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.

In 2026
Risk score
5
MODERATE

Ranked #5 of 14 VT counties

31k residents · 20 cities · 20 tracts

1976–2026 · pop-weighted from cities

Rutland County eviction risk score history

Min2.3 Average3.7 Now5
10 5 1976 · score 2.4 1977 · score 2.4 1978 · score 2.3 1979 · score 2.3 1980 · score 2.4 1981 · score 2.3 1982 · score 2.4 1983 · score 2.4 1984 · score 2.3 1985 · score 2.3 1986 · score 2.3 1987 · score 2.6 1988 · score 2.6 1989 · score 2.6 1990 · score 2.7 1991 · score 2.8 1992 · score 2.9 1993 · score 2.9 1994 · score 2.9 1995 · score 2.9 1996 · score 3.2 1997 · score 3.2 1998 · score 3.2 1999 · score 3.2 2000 · score 3.3 2001 · score 3.3 2002 · score 3.3 2003 · score 3.4 2004 · score 3.5 2005 · score 3.6 2006 · score 3.6 2007 · score 3.7 2008 · score 4.6 2009 · score 4.8 2010 · score 4.8 2011 · score 4.9 2012 · score 4.8 2013 · score 4.8 2014 · score 4.8 2015 · score 4.8 2016 · score 4.8 2017 · score 4.8 2018 · score 4.7 2019 · score 4.7 2020 · score 6.1 2021 · score 6.2 2022 · score 5.3 2023 · score 5.0 2024 · score 5.1 2025 · score 5.0 2026 · score 5.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Rutland County averages 5.5/10 across its 20 cities, ranging from a low of 4.7 to a high of 5.8, where Poultney, Castleton Four Corners, North Clarendon, and Benson share the highest-risk position in the county. Ranked 3rd of 14 Vermont counties by eviction risk.

How Rutland County ranks in Vermont

Lower number means more extreme, where #1 is the most
Eviction Risk Score
Elevated
#5 of 14 VT counties 5.0 / 10
Eviction Risk Score, 69th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 14 counties in Vermont for landlord eviction risk.
Cost of living
Elevated
#23 of 51 states (statewide) 98.0 index
Cost of living, 56th percentileLowHigh
Vermont ranks #23 of 51 states on overall cost of living (2.0% cheaper than the U.S. avg).
Housing services cost
Moderate
#26 of 51 states (statewide) 86.5 index
Housing services cost, 50th percentileLowHigh
Vermont ranks #26 of 51 states on housing services (13.5% cheaper than the U.S. avg).
Income spent on rent
Moderate
#8 of 14 VT counties 30.3% of income
Income spent on rent, 46th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 14 counties in Vermont on % of income spent on rent.

Landlord guides for Vermont

State-specific playbooks
Vermont Eviction Costs →
Filing fees, attorney fees, lost rent, sheriff lockout
Vermont Eviction Process →
Step-by-step timeline, notices, statute cites
Vermont Rent Control →
Statewide caps, local ordinances, just-cause
Vermont Tenant Screening →
Five-point protocol, legal rules, protected classes
Vermont Tenant Protections →
Just cause, retaliation, habitability, entry
Cities in Rutland County
Sorted by Eviction Risk Score · highest first
Map view
CityPopulationRisk% income on rentAverage rentLean
001 Rutland Pop 15,712 · 31.5% income · $995 rent · Dem 15,712 5.2 31.5% $995 Dem
002 Fair Haven Pop 2,537 · 22.0% income · $768 rent · Dem 2,537 4.8 22.0% $768 Dem
003 West Rutland Pop 2,125 · 33.5% income · $883 rent · Dem 2,125 4.7 33.5% $883 Dem
004 Brandon Pop 1,927 · 24.6% income · $1,125 rent · Dem 1,927 4.5 24.6% $1,125 Dem
005 Proctor Pop 1,586 · 25.8% income · $1,059 rent · Dem 1,586 4.7 25.8% $1,059 Dem
006 Castleton Pop 1,052 · 51.0% income · $1,331 rent · Dem 1,052 5.1 51.0% $1,331 Dem
007 Poultney Pop 1,033 · 22.3% income · $868 rent · Dem 1,033 5.0 22.3% $868 Dem
008 Pittsford Pop 891 · 34.0% income · $917 rent · Dem 891 5.2 34.0% $917 Dem
009 Castleton Four Corners Pop 732 · 29.1% income · $990 rent · Dem 732 4.9 29.1% $990 Dem
010 Wallingford Pop 643 · 22.1% income · $927 rent · Dem 643 4.4 22.1% $927 Dem
011 Killington Village Pop 506 · 25.6% income · $970 rent · Dem 506 4.8 25.6% $970 Dem
012 West Pawlet Pop 368 · 32.5% income · $950 rent · Dem 368 4.9 32.5% $950 Dem
013 Pawlet Pop 330 · 19.7% income · $1,472 rent · Dem 330 4.8 19.7% $1,472 Dem
014 Wells Pop 308 · 30.1% income · $990 rent · Dem 308 4.5 30.1% $990 Dem
015 North Clarendon Pop 297 · 31.7% income · $785 rent · Dem 297 4.5 31.7% $785 Dem
016 Benson Pop 193 · 51.0% income · $1,375 rent · Dem 193 5.2 51.0% $1,375 Dem
017 Middletown Springs Pop 181 · 25.3% income · $969 rent · Dem 181 4.7 25.3% $969 Dem
018 East Poultney Pop 176 · 30.1% income · $990 rent · Dem 176 4.4 30.1% $990 Dem
019 Danby Pop 172 · 18.5% income · $988 rent · Dem 172 4.6 18.5% $988 Dem
020 Chittenden Pop 93 · 45.0% income · $1,045 rent · Dem 93 4.4 45.0% $1,045 Dem

County heatmap

Geographic distribution
Local landlord context

One county, multiple regulatory regimes.

Rutland County carries an average eviction-risk score of 5/10, placing it in the Elevated tier and ranking it 3rd of 14 Vermont counties by risk. Only 2 counties in the state score higher, meaning 11 are more landlord-friendly. For investors and operators active in Vermont eviction laws, that context matters: this county sits in the higher-risk third of the state, where tenant-protection statutes, just-cause requirements, and a 30.1% average rent burden combine to create conditions where eviction is a real and recurring cost of doing business.

With 20 cities or places tracked and individual scores running from 4.7 to 5.8, the county is not monolithic. The average rent of $988 and a renter share of 35.4% of households point to a market that is meaningfully renter-occupied but not dominated by large apartment complexes. Landlords here tend to be smaller operators for whom a contested eviction is a significant financial and operational disruption.

The cities inside Rutland County

The highest-risk locations in the county all score 5.8/10: Poultney (population 1,033), Castleton Four Corners, North Clarendon, and Benson each sit at the county ceiling. Wallingford comes in just behind at 5.7/10, followed by West Rutland at 5.6/10 (population 2,125). These communities are smaller in population but their risk profiles are elevated relative to the county average, which means local income volatility and renter distress indicators push scores toward the top of the range.

The county seat, Rutland, is by far the largest market at 15,712 residents and scores 5.4/10, sitting below the county average. Pittsford also scores 5.4/10. The lowest score anywhere in the county is 4.7/10, demonstrating that risk is genuinely hyper-local: a landlord operating across two or three towns in the same county can be working in materially different risk environments. Reviewing city-level scores before acquiring or renewing leases is not optional in a market like this.

State-level laws that apply here

Vermont state law under 9 V.S.A. § 4451 et seq. governs all residential tenancies in Rutland County. For nonpayment of rent, landlords must serve a 14-day notice before proceeding. Lease-violation cures and no-cause end-of-term terminations each require a 30-day notice. Vermont requires just cause to terminate a tenancy, which narrows a landlord's exit options and is a meaningful constraint when a problem tenant is otherwise technically compliant. The Vermont eviction process runs 30 to 60 days on an uncontested case and 60 to 150 days if contested. The Vermont eviction costs landlords can expect include a court filing fee of $295 to $340, sheriff fees of $60 to $150, and attorney fees ranging from $750 to $3,000 depending on complexity and whether the case is disputed.

Vermont does not currently cap rent statewide, and local preemption of rent control is not in place, meaning municipalities retain some latitude. Source-of-income discrimination is protected under Vermont law, so screening criteria tied to payment source require careful review. Landlords should also note that Vermont security deposit limits and tenant-protection rules apply uniformly across the state, including in every city in Rutland County. Entry requires 48 hours advance notice under 9 V.S.A. § 4457.

With a poverty rate of 13.6% across the county, the renter pool carries real income fragility; the city-level risk grid above breaks down where that pressure concentrates most, helping you prioritize due diligence at the local level before committing capital.

Eviction filings in Rutland County

In September 2025, 21 eviction filings were recorded in Rutland County, 109.1% of the historical average (near average).1

Last 24 months of filings 2023-10 – 2025-09
Monthly eviction filings in Rutland County (LSC CCDI)2023-10: 33 filings (146.7% of avg)2023-11: 19 filings (100.0% of avg)2023-12: 16 filings (103.2% of avg)2024-01: 21 filings (91.3% of avg)2024-02: 16 filings (71.9% of avg)2024-03: 21 filings (118.3% of avg)2024-04: 17 filings (88.3% of avg)2024-05: 10 filings (41.7% of avg)2024-06: 17 filings (70.8% of avg)2024-07: 16 filings (76.2% of avg)2024-08: 12 filings (42.5% of avg)2024-09: 25 filings (129.9% of avg)2024-10: 20 filings (88.9% of avg)2024-11: 18 filings (94.7% of avg)2024-12: 6 filings (38.7% of avg)2025-01: 23 filings (100.0% of avg)2025-02: 25 filings (112.4% of avg)2025-03: 25 filings (140.9% of avg)2025-04: 19 filings (98.7% of avg)2025-05: 18 filings (75.0% of avg)2025-06: 13 filings (54.2% of avg)2025-07: 14 filings (66.7% of avg)2025-08: 16 filings (56.6% of avg)2025-09: 21 filings (109.1% of avg)

Historical eviction filings in Rutland County

From 2009 to 2018, eviction filings in Rutland County increased 32%. The peak was 286 filings in 2012.2

Annual filings 2009–2018 No filing data published after 2018
Annual eviction filings in Rutland County 2000-2018 (Eviction Lab)2009: 203 filings2010: 212 filings2011: 225 filings2012: 286 filings2013: 281 filings2014: 269 filings2015: 256 filings2016: 254 filings2017: 265 filings2018: 267 filings

Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.

How Rutland County compares

Rutland County's average eviction-risk score of 5.5/10 ranks it 3rd riskiest of Vermont's 14 counties, placing it in the higher-risk third of the state. Among its closest peers, Windham County is the only one that scores meaningfully higher at 5.84/10, while Bennington County is nearly identical at 5.51/10. Franklin County (5.19), Windsor County (5.17), and Washington County (5.09) all post lower risk scores, suggesting those markets carry less tenant-distress pressure for landlords.

Peer counties in Vermont

Same state, closest by population and Eviction Risk Score
Peer county
Washington County eviction risk
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Pop. 25.9K
Peer county
Bennington County eviction risk
4.9
/ 10 · Moderate
Pop. 18.3K
Peer county
Windham County eviction risk
5.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Pop. 16.7K
Peer county
Orleans County eviction risk
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Pop. 9.5K

Where eviction risk concentrates in Rutland County

Top cities + top neighborhoods · click any card for the full breakdown

Top cities by population

Top neighborhoods by risk

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about Rutland County

Q1

How does Rutland County compare to Vermont statewide?

Rutland County averages 5/10. Use the Vermont overview link in the breadcrumb above for statewide comparison.
Q2

Is 30.1% rent-to-income ratio high for Rutland County?

30.1% is above the 30% federal threshold.
Q3

Where can I see all cities in Rutland County?

The city grid above lists every municipality in Rutland County with its risk score and population.