Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Lorfax Heights Eviction Risk: Lower , Crosspointe

Tract 51059492203 · Fairfax County, VA · pop 3,596 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 51059492203 covers part of the Lorfax Heights area of Crosspointe, VA, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,596. Against Fairfax County at 41.0%, 100% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 0% Owners 99%
Tract context
Occupied units1,149
Renter share0.6%
SVI overall0.00
Poverty rate1.2%
Median income$247,375

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Lorfax Heights
Very Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Crosspointe
Moderate
Within county
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#274 of 274 tracts In Fairfax County
Very Low
Within state
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#1,798 of 2,186 tracts In Virginia
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Crosspointe and the region

Centroid at 38.7212, -77.2643 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lorfax Heights scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Crosspointe
7.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.1
State political climate
Virginia legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
1.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Crosspointe
1.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Crosspointe
2.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Crosspointe
2.0

How Lorfax Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lorfax Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 492203Crosspointe: 3.43.4Crosspointeparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.24.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 0

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 13Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 6.87%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.0%Peak (2013)
  • 1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 510594922032011: 4 filings (8.70/100 renter HHs)2012: 2 filings (4.35/100 renter HHs)2013: 6 filings (13.04/100 renter HHs)2016: 1 filings (1.39/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 75% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lorfax Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lorfax Heights

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.6/10.

Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 2/10. Food insecurity runs 5.5% against 17.8% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 3.3% against 15.2% nationally. Against the Fairfax County average of 4.3, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.3 points.

Court records carry 13 eviction filings across 4 observed years. The worst year on record was 2013, when 13.0% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 6.9% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 1% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1/10.

Statewide the VA average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 51059492203

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 51059492203?

Census tract 51059492203 in the Lorfax Heights neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 51059492203?

1.2% of residents in tract 51059492203 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,596.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 51059492203?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 0th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 17th, minority 50th, housing 0th.
Q4

Is tract 51059492203 considered part of Lorfax Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 51059492203 fall within Lorfax Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 51059492203?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 13 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 51059492203 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.87% of renter households, peaking at 13.0% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 51059492203 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 51059492203 compare to Crosspointe overall?

Tract 51059492203 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Crosspointe at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Crosspointe; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related