Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #82,639 of 84,120 nationally

Dartmoor Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Haymarket

Tract 51153901506 · Prince William County, VA · pop 7,010 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

In Dartmoor Park in Haymarket, census tract 51153901506 scores 6.1/10 for eviction risk. It lands near the 76th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 59% of renter households, a severe level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $3,098 a month while the average household earns $153,000 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 22% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 9% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,840
Renter share21.8%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate3.5%
Median income$153,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Dartmoor Park
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Haymarket
Very High
Within county
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#76 of 93 tracts In Prince William County
Very Low
Within state
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#1,987 of 2,186 tracts In Virginia
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Haymarket and the region

Centroid at 38.8151, -77.6231 · click any tract to drill in

Why Dartmoor Park scores 1.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Haymarket
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.4
State political climate
Virginia legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
3.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,098 rent vs county FMR
8.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Haymarket
7.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Haymarket
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Haymarket
4.8

How Dartmoor Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Dartmoor Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.11.1This tracttract 901506Haymarket: 3.43.4Haymarketparent cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.03.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 17

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 3Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 1.18%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.2%Peak (2016)
  • 3Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Dartmoor Park

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 8.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Haymarket, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Prince William County average of 5.7 and above the Virginia statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 17th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 51153901506

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 51153901506?

Census tract 51153901506 in the Dartmoor Park neighborhood scores 1.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 51153901506?

Median gross rent is $3,098/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 51153901506?

3.5% of residents in tract 51153901506 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,010.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 51153901506?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 51th, minority 74th, housing 6th.
Q5

Is tract 51153901506 considered part of Dartmoor Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 51153901506 fall within Dartmoor Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 51153901506?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 51153901506 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.18% of renter households, peaking at 1.2% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 51153901506 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 51153901506 compare to Haymarket overall?

Tract 51153901506 scores 1.1/10, lower than the parent city of Haymarket at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Haymarket; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Haymarket

Top eight tracts in Haymarket ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related