Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally

Chuckatuck Eviction Risk: Lower , Suffolk

Tract 51800075302 · Suffolk city, VA · pop 2,174 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Tract 51800075302 covers the Chuckatuck neighborhood of Suffolk in Virginia. Home to 2,174 residents, it scores 4.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 24% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

39% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $93,519 a year. Renters make up 15% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 70% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 9% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units938
Renter share14.9%
SVI overall0.29
Poverty rate18.6%
Median income$93,519

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Chuckatuck
Moderate
Within parent city
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 36 tracts In Suffolk
Elevated
Within county
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#11 of 36 tracts In Suffolk city
Elevated
Within state
62 th percentile
Rank, 62nd percentileLowHigh
#826 of 2,186 tracts In Virginia
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Suffolk and the region

Centroid at 36.8678, -76.5786 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chuckatuck scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Suffolk
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Virginia legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
18.6% poverty · this tract
4.6
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Suffolk
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Suffolk
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Suffolk
3.5

How Chuckatuck compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chuckatuck risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.43.4This tracttract 075302Suffolk: 3.83.8Suffolkparent cityCounty: 2.92.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.03.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 29

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 93Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 10.44%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.0%Peak (2011)
  • 11Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 518000753022011: 21 filings (13.04/100 renter HHs)2012: 21 filings (13.04/100 renter HHs)2013: 12 filings (7.45/100 renter HHs)2014: 13 filings (8.07/100 renter HHs)2015: 15 filings (9.32/100 renter HHs)2016: 11 filings (11.70/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 48% over the past 6 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chuckatuck

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Suffolk eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Suffolk City County average of 4.3 and below the Virginia statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 29th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 51800075302

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 51800075302?

Census tract 51800075302 in the Chuckatuck neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 51800075302?

18.6% of residents in tract 51800075302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,174.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 51800075302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 29th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 40th, household 8th, minority 54th, housing 39th.
Q4

Is tract 51800075302 considered part of Chuckatuck?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 51800075302 fall within Chuckatuck (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 51800075302?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 93 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 51800075302 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.44% of renter households, peaking at 13.0% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 51800075302 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 51800075302 compare to Suffolk overall?

Tract 51800075302 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Suffolk at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Suffolk eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Suffolk

Top eight tracts in Suffolk ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related