Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #4,782 of 84,120 nationally

Forks Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 53009000300 · Clallam County, WA · pop 4,373 · 61% of tract blocks fall in Forks

The Moderate-tier score of 5.5/10 for census tract 53009000300 reflects conditions in Forks, Washington. It lands near the 55th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

43% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $875 a month while the average household earns $46,722 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 43% of occupied homes.

Risk score
7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 24% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units1,950
Renter share42.8%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate21.0%
Median income$46,722

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Forks
Moderate
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 24 tracts In Clallam County
Very High
Within state
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#108 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very High
National
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#4,782 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Forks and the region

Centroid at 47.9450, -124.3708 · click any tract to drill in

Why Forks scores 7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Forks
5.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
21.0% poverty · this tract
5.2
Supply constraint
$875 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forks
6.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forks
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forks
7.3

How Forks compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Forks risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.07.0This tracttract 000300Forks: 7.17.1Forksparent cityCounty: 5.45.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 80Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 1.25%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.2%Peak (2014)
  • 11Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530090003002004: 8 filings (1.38/100 renter HHs)2005: 11 filings (1.80/100 renter HHs)2006: 3 filings (0.49/100 renter HHs)2008: 3 filings (0.49/100 renter HHs)2010: 3 filings (0.50/100 renter HHs)2014: 17 filings (2.17/100 renter HHs)2015: 15 filings (1.91/100 renter HHs)2017: 9 filings (1.11/100 renter HHs)2018: 11 filings (1.36/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 38% over the past 9 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Forks

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Forks, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Clallam County average of 5.1 and in line with the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 80 eviction filings here over 9 tracked years, with about 1.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.2% of renter households in 2014.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 96th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53009000300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53009000300?

Census tract 53009000300 in Forks scores 7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53009000300?

Median gross rent is $875/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53009000300?

21.0% of residents in tract 53009000300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,373.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53009000300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 97th, minority 57th, housing 97th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53009000300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 80 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 53009000300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.25% of renter households, peaking at 2.2% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 53009000300 compare to Forks overall?

Tract 53009000300 scores 7/10, right in line with the parent city of Forks at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forks; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related