Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #9,878 of 84,120 nationally

Carlsborg Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 53009001800 · Clallam County, WA · pop 3,059 · 9% of tract blocks fall in Carlsborg

Census tract 53009001800 runs through Carlsborg. With 3,059 residents, it scores 6.2/10 for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 79% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

70% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 41% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,681 monthly, set against $69,010 in average yearly household income, roughly 29% of income at the averages. Renters make up 16% of occupied homes.

Risk score
6.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 5% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,283
Renter share16.1%
SVI overall0.33
Poverty rate17.2%
Median income$69,010

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Carlsborg
Very High
Within county
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 24 tracts In Clallam County
High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#267 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
High
National
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#9,878 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Carlsborg and the region

Centroid at 47.9919, -123.1920 · click any tract to drill in

Why Carlsborg scores 6.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Carlsborg
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
17.2% poverty · this tract
4.3
Supply constraint
$1,681 rent vs county FMR
8.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Carlsborg
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Carlsborg
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Carlsborg
8.6

How Carlsborg compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Carlsborg risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.26.2This tracttract 001800Carlsborg: 6.86.8Carlsborgparent cityCounty: 5.45.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 33

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 35Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 2.41%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.8%Peak (2015)
  • 5Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530090018002004: 1 filings (0.74/100 renter HHs)2005: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2006: 1 filings (0.42/100 renter HHs)2008: 4 filings (1.69/100 renter HHs)2010: 5 filings (3.07/100 renter HHs)2014: 5 filings (1.74/100 renter HHs)2015: 8 filings (2.79/100 renter HHs)2017: 6 filings (4.80/100 renter HHs)2018: 5 filings (4.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 400% over the past 9 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Carlsborg

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Carlsborg, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Clallam County average of 5.1 and above the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 35 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 2.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.8% of renter households in 2015.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 33rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 53009001800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53009001800?

Census tract 53009001800 in Carlsborg scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53009001800?

Median gross rent is $1,681/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 70% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53009001800?

17.2% of residents in tract 53009001800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,059.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53009001800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 33th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 23th, minority 15th, housing 40th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53009001800?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 35 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 53009001800 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.41% of renter households, peaking at 2.8% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 53009001800 compare to Carlsborg overall?

Tract 53009001800 scores 6.2/10, lower than the parent city of Carlsborg at 6.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Carlsborg; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Carlsborg

Top eight tracts in Carlsborg ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related