Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Tenant beats landlord
48.5%
/ 100 outcomes
In court-decided eviction outcomes for Carlsborg, WA, tenants prevail in roughly 48.5% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses, longer calendars, and more required documentation, and landlord-friendliness drops as this rises.
Timeline
171d
filing → judgment
From the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Carlsborg, WA until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 171 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent and higher carry costs for landlords.
Cost range
$8.8–18.1k
legal + lost rent
A typical eviction in Carlsborg, WA costs landlords $8,848 to $18,066 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent during the calendar between filing and possession.
Average rent
$1,295
51% stretched on rent
Average gross rent in Carlsborg, WA is $1,295 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey (5-year 2023). 51% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent, the federal cost-burden threshold.
Renters
16.0%
of households
16.0% of occupied housing units in Carlsborg, WA are renter-occupied (vs owner-occupied). A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings, more turnover, and a more active rental market.
Poverty
18.9%
4.6% unemp.
18.9% of Carlsborg, WA residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 4.6%. Both feed into the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model because rent payment problems track poverty + joblessness more reliably than any other single signal.
Time machine
Scrub 50 years
197619861996200620162026
2026
● LIVE · today◀ REPLAY · historical
Nine-axis profile
9-axis profile · today
Shape of the risk surface
1 landlord · 10 tenant
Sub-scores · with sparkline
Where the score comes from
1 → 10 scale
Local political climate
Dem margin +7.9% (2024)
7.8
Regional political climate
County-weighted neighbor mix
7.8
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
18.9% poverty · 4.6% unemp.
4.4
Supply constraint
$1,295 average · 16.0% renters
6.4
Rent Control risk
51.0% of income on rent
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
171 days filing → judgment
5.4
Tenant organizing strength
16.0% renters
5.1
Housing court bias
County bench composition
8.6
Geographic context
Risk heat across Carlsborg and the region
Click any city to see its score
How Carlsborg compares
Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Clallam County
Moderate
#5of 9 cities
#5 of 9 cities in Clallam County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
Elevated
#225of 637 cities
#225 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Score story
Six-stop tour of the risk profile
6.8
/ 10 · ELEVATED
The verdict
A Elevated-tier market.
Composite 6.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.
50-yr trend+4.2 over 50 yr
197620012026
Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible
171d
Typical timeline
The money
What renting (and evicting) looks like.
Rent published at $1,295/mo. A contested eviction takes 171 days and costs $8,848–$18,066 per case.
50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
197620012026
Court-clerk data lands in the next release.
16.0%
Renters
The renters
Who you'll be renting to.
Out of 1,231 residents, 16.0% rent. 51% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 18.9% below the poverty line.
50-yr trendRenter share rising
197620012026
ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.
7.8
Local + regional
The politics
Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.
Local & regional political climate score 7.8 and 7.8 (Dem margin +7.9% (2024)). State climate at 6, a mid-range statehouse.
50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
197620012026
Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.
6
State politics
The process
Moderate calendar, moderate friction.
State political climate 6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.4, housing court bias 8.6, rent-control risk 9.6. Standard process speed for the state.
50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.4 since '00
197620012026
Court-clerk data lands in the next release.
4.4
Economic stress
The stress
Economic pressure is the background risk.
Economic stress: 4.4. Supply constraint: 6.4. The numbers behind those: 18.9% poverty, 4.6% unemployment, 51% of income on rent.
50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
197620012026
Mirrors BLS unemployment series.
US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost
Carlsborg sits in the slow & expensive quadrant
Bubble size = population · color = risk score
Carlsborg · 171d · ~$13.5k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.8National average: 58d · $4.6k all-inHover any bubble for stats · click to openColor: 0–4 4–7 7–10
Landlording in Carlsborg, Washington, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.8/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.
Carlsborg is a city of 1,231 residents where 16.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 51.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,295/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.
01Process
How Carlsborg eviction process actually works
Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Carlsborg closes 171 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.
The slow part of Carlsborg's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 8.6/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.
02Cost
What it costs (and how long it takes)
An all-in eviction in Carlsborg runs $8,848 to $18,066 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.
For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 171 days of typical timeline and $1,295/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.
03Operations
Security deposits, screening, and lease terms
Tenant organizing strength scores 5.1/10 in Carlsborg, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (9.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:
Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy
What an everyday landlord should actually do here
If you own one to four units in Carlsborg: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.
The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $18,066 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.
04bPractical traps
Local traps to avoid in Carlsborg
Trap · 8.6/10
For landlords, the 5.1/10 score is most actionable when combined with San Juan County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 8.6/10. Use proactive screening and documented notices.
05FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Q1
What if my tenant claims a maintenance issue for not paying rent?
In Washington, tenants generally cannot withhold rent for maintenance issues unless they follow a very specific "repair and deduct" procedure outlined in RCW § 59.18.090. They must give you proper written notice, wait a reasonable time, and the repair must be essential. If they haven't followed the law, their claim might not hold up in court, but it will certainly complicate your eviction case. Always address maintenance requests promptly and keep detailed records.
Q2
Can I turn off utilities if a tenant stops paying rent?
Absolutely not. That's an illegal self-help eviction in Washington and carries severe penalties. You cannot lock out a tenant, remove their belongings, or cut off utilities. All evictions must go through the court process. Doing so will put you in legal jeopardy and could cost you far more than the back rent.
Q3
How do I handle a tenant who has unauthorized occupants?
If your lease prohibits unauthorized occupants, this is a lease violation. You'd typically issue a 10-day notice to comply or vacate. The notice should demand that the unauthorized person move out or that the tenant follow the lease's application process. If they don't comply, you can then proceed with an unlawful detainer action based on the lease violation. Make sure your lease is clear on who can live in the unit.
Q4
What if the tenant damages the property during the eviction process?
Document everything with photos and videos. Once you regain possession, you can use the security deposit to cover damages beyond normal wear and tear. If the damages exceed the deposit, you can sue the tenant in small claims court or pursue it as part of the unlawful detainer judgment if your attorney includes it. However, collecting from a tenant who has already been evicted can be difficult.
Q5
Can I offer "cash for keys" in Carlsborg?
Yes, "cash for keys" is a legal and often smart option in Washington. It's a mutual agreement where you pay the tenant a sum of money to voluntarily vacate the property by a specific date, leaving it in good condition. Get this agreement in writing, have both parties sign it, and make sure it includes a clause that the tenant surrenders possession and you release them from future rent obligations. It often saves time and money compared to a contested eviction.
A 6.8/10 places Carlsborg in the 66th percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.
Cities with similar eviction risk to Carlsborg (6.8/10)
Same risk band nationally · click any city for its full breakdown.
