Neighborhood · Ranked #13,812 of 84,120 nationally
Canterbury Eviction Risk: Elevated , Seattle
Tract 53033006300 ·
King County, WA · pop 5,709 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Tract 53033006300 sits in the Canterbury area of Seattle eviction risk, WA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.8/10. The dominant input is local political climate at 9.5/10.
Risk score
6.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15%Stable renters 30%Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units2,641
Renter share44.8%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate1.6%
Median income$189,236
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Canterbury
Moderate
Within parent city
0th percentile
#177 of 177 tracts In Seattle
Very Low
Within county
47th percentile
#265 of 494 tracts In King County
Moderate
Within state
68th percentile
#569 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Seattle and the region
Centroid at 47.6350, -122.2768 · click any tract to drill in
Why Canterbury scores 6.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Seattle
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
1.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,353 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Seattle
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Seattle
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Seattle
8.5
How Canterbury compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 21
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
21%Socioeconomic
33%Household composition
24%Racial/ethnic minority
31%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
48%Grade A
34%Grade B
4%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
28Total filings over 8 yrs
0.34%Avg annual filing rate
0.6%Peak (2005)
2Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year2004 to 2013
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Canterbury
Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 9/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 9/10. roughly one in three of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the King County average of 44.1%.
Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Disability prevalence runs 18.2% against 31.5% nationally. Average gross rent is $2,353, 16% above the Seattle average.
The filing record is not thin: 28 evictions over 8 years of observation. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.2% against 11.3% nationally. Filings peaked in 2005 at 0.6% of renter households.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 0.3% of renter households face a filing.
Nationally it ranks #13,812 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Against average income of $189,236, annual rent is just 15%.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 53033006300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53033006300?
Census tract 53033006300 in the Canterbury neighborhood scores 6.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53033006300?
Median gross rent is $2,353/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53033006300?
1.6% of residents in tract 53033006300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,709.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53033006300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 33th, minority 24th, housing 31th.
Q5
Is tract 53033006300 considered part of Canterbury?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53033006300 fall within Canterbury (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53033006300?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 28 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 53033006300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.34% of renter households, peaking at 0.6% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
How does tract 53033006300 compare to Seattle overall?
Tract 53033006300 scores 6.8/10, lower than the parent city of Seattle at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Seattle eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 53033006300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Seattle
Top eight tracts in Seattle ranked by composite eviction-risk score.