Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #23,808 of 84,120 nationally

The Highlands At Newcastle Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 53033025005 · King County, WA · pop 6,330 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

With a score of 5.5/10, tract 53033025005 in the The Highlands At Newcastle area of Newcastle, WA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.3/10.

Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 25% Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units2,647
Renter share40.4%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$163,250

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In The Highlands At Newcastle
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Newcastle
Very High
Within county
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#406 of 494 tracts In King County
Very Low
Within state
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#1,031 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Newcastle and the region

Centroid at 47.5307, -122.1467 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Highlands At Newcastle scores 5.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Newcastle
7.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$2,251 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Newcastle
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Newcastle
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Newcastle
4.2

How The Highlands At Newcastle compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Highlands At Newcastle risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.55.5This tracttract 025005Newcastle: 6.46.4Newcastleparent cityCounty: 6.76.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 24

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 72Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 1.99%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.5%Peak (2009)
  • 7Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530330250052004: 5 filings (3.13/100 renter HHs)2005: 9 filings (2.55/100 renter HHs)2006: 3 filings (0.85/100 renter HHs)2007: 7 filings (1.98/100 renter HHs)2008: 9 filings (2.55/100 renter HHs)2009: 16 filings (4.52/100 renter HHs)2010: 1 filings (0.20/100 renter HHs)2011: 12 filings (2.26/100 renter HHs)2012: 3 filings (0.56/100 renter HHs)2013: 7 filings (1.32/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 40% over the past 10 months.
Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Highlands At Newcastle

22% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Disability prevalence runs 16.7% against 31.5% nationally. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.9/10.

Against King County at 44.1%, 38% of renters here are cost-burdened. Against the King County average of 6.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.2 points. Well under the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 2.3/10.

Court records carry 72 eviction filings across 10 observed years. Filings peaked in 2009 at 4.5% of renter households. In a typical year about 2.0% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 72% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.1/10.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 53033025005

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53033025005?

Census tract 53033025005 in the The Highlands At Newcastle neighborhood scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53033025005?

Median gross rent is $2,251/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53033025005?

5.2% of residents in tract 53033025005 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,330.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53033025005?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 14th, household 14th, minority 72th, housing 47th.
Q5

Is tract 53033025005 considered part of The Highlands At Newcastle?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53033025005 fall within The Highlands At Newcastle (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53033025005?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 72 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 53033025005 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.99% of renter households, peaking at 4.5% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 53033025005 compare to Newcastle overall?

Tract 53033025005 scores 5.5/10, lower than the parent city of Newcastle at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Newcastle; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Newcastle

Top eight tracts in Newcastle ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related