Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally

Crystal Ridge Eviction Risk: Lower , Alderton

Tract 53053070401 · Pierce County, WA · pop 2,159 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

With a score of 4.9/10, tract 53053070401 in the Crystal Ridge neighborhood of Alderton ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 2,159 residents. That is riskier than about 33% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 28% of renter households, a moderate level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,829 monthly, set against $101,364 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 20% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 14% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units794
Renter share19.5%
SVI overall0.44
Poverty rate7.9%
Median income$101,364

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Crystal Ridge
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Alderton
Moderate
Within county
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#106 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Moderate
Within state
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#1,169 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Alderton and the region

Centroid at 47.1679, -122.2249 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crystal Ridge scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Alderton
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
7.9% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,829 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Alderton
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Alderton
4.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Alderton
5.8

How Crystal Ridge compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crystal Ridge risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 070401Alderton: 7.27.2Aldertonparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 44

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 56Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 4.06%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.0%Peak (2004)
  • 5Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530530704012004: 7 filings (5.04/100 renter HHs)2005: 1 filings (0.85/100 renter HHs)2006: 5 filings (4.25/100 renter HHs)2007: 7 filings (5.95/100 renter HHs)2008: 3 filings (2.55/100 renter HHs)2009: 4 filings (3.40/100 renter HHs)2010: 6 filings (4.65/100 renter HHs)2012: 4 filings (3.12/100 renter HHs)2013: 7 filings (5.47/100 renter HHs)2014: 7 filings (5.47/100 renter HHs)2015: 5 filings (3.91/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 29% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 25Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.47×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (9.09× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (9.09× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Crystal Ridge. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crystal Ridge

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 6.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Alderton, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Pierce County average of 5.5 and in line with the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 56 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 4.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.0% of renter households in 2004.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.47x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053070401

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053070401?

Census tract 53053070401 in the Crystal Ridge neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053070401?

Median gross rent is $1,829/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053070401?

7.9% of residents in tract 53053070401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,159.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053070401?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 44th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 33th, minority 44th, housing 21th.
Q5

Is tract 53053070401 considered part of Crystal Ridge?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053070401 fall within Crystal Ridge (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053070401?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 56 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053070401 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.06% of renter households, peaking at 5.0% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053070401 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.47× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 53053070401 compare to Alderton overall?

Tract 53053070401 scores 3.8/10, lower than the parent city of Alderton at 7.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Alderton; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related