Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally

Crystal Ridge Eviction Risk: Lower , Alderton

Tract 53053071210 · Pierce County, WA · pop 5,925 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

With a score of 5.6/10, tract 53053071210 in the Crystal Ridge neighborhood of Alderton ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 5,925 residents. That is riskier than roughly 59% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 54% of renter households, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,139 a month while the average household earns $135,938 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 16% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 8% Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units1,939
Renter share16.5%
SVI overall0.25
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$135,938

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Crystal Ridge
Very Low
Within parent city
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 8 tracts In Alderton
Very Low
Within county
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#133 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Low
Within state
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#1,425 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Alderton and the region

Centroid at 47.1681, -122.2409 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crystal Ridge scores 2.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Alderton
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$2,139 rent vs county FMR
5.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Alderton
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Alderton
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Alderton
5.1

How Crystal Ridge compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crystal Ridge risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.92.9This tracttract 071210Alderton: 7.27.2Aldertonparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 25

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 50Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 2.79%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.6%Peak (2008)
  • 3Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530530712102004: 1 filings (0.80/100 renter HHs)2005: 5 filings (3.82/100 renter HHs)2006: 5 filings (3.82/100 renter HHs)2007: 5 filings (3.82/100 renter HHs)2008: 6 filings (4.58/100 renter HHs)2009: 6 filings (4.58/100 renter HHs)2010: 5 filings (2.96/100 renter HHs)2012: 5 filings (1.85/100 renter HHs)2013: 5 filings (1.85/100 renter HHs)2014: 4 filings (1.48/100 renter HHs)2015: 3 filings (1.11/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 200% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 15Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.65×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (9.09× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Crystal Ridge. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crystal Ridge

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Alderton, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Pierce County average of 5.5 and above the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.65x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 50 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 2.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.6% of renter households in 2008.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053071210

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053071210?

Census tract 53053071210 in the Crystal Ridge neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053071210?

Median gross rent is $2,139/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053071210?

5.2% of residents in tract 53053071210 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,925.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053071210?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 25th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 22th, household 29th, minority 32th, housing 40th.
Q5

Is tract 53053071210 considered part of Crystal Ridge?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053071210 fall within Crystal Ridge (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053071210?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 50 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053071210 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.79% of renter households, peaking at 4.6% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053071210 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.65× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 53053071210 compare to Alderton overall?

Tract 53053071210 scores 2.9/10, lower than the parent city of Alderton at 7.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Alderton; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Alderton

Top eight tracts in Alderton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related