Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

Whitehawk Eviction Risk: Lower , Orting

Tract 53053070403 · Pierce County, WA · pop 4,253 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 53053070403 (Whitehawk in Orting, Washington) comes in at 5.6/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 59% of US census tracts.

50% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,124 a month against an average household income of $111,604 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 22% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 11% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,536
Renter share21.7%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate3.4%
Median income$111,604

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Whitehawk
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Orting
Very High
Within county
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#169 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Very Low
Within state
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#1,640 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Orting and the region

Centroid at 47.0802, -122.2117 · click any tract to drill in

Why Whitehawk scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Orting
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
3.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,124 rent vs county FMR
5.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Orting
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Orting
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Orting
5.4

How Whitehawk compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Whitehawk risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 070403Orting: 6.96.9Ortingparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 38

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 75Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 2.55%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.6%Peak (2012)
  • 3Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530530704032004: 4 filings (2.15/100 renter HHs)2005: 6 filings (2.62/100 renter HHs)2006: 5 filings (2.19/100 renter HHs)2007: 5 filings (2.19/100 renter HHs)2008: 10 filings (4.37/100 renter HHs)2009: 7 filings (3.06/100 renter HHs)2010: 6 filings (2.01/100 renter HHs)2012: 12 filings (3.56/100 renter HHs)2013: 10 filings (2.97/100 renter HHs)2014: 7 filings (2.08/100 renter HHs)2015: 3 filings (0.89/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 25% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 30Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.53×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Whitehawk

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Orting, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Pierce County average of 5.5 and above the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 38th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 75 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 2.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.6% of renter households in 2012.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053070403

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053070403?

Census tract 53053070403 in the Whitehawk neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053070403?

Median gross rent is $2,124/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053070403?

3.4% of residents in tract 53053070403 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,253.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053070403?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 14th, household 38th, minority 30th, housing 83th.
Q5

Is tract 53053070403 considered part of Whitehawk?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053070403 fall within Whitehawk (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053070403?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 75 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053070403 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.55% of renter households, peaking at 3.6% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053070403 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.53× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 53053070403 compare to Orting overall?

Tract 53053070403 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Orting at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Orting; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Orting

Top eight tracts in Orting ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related