Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally

The Ridge at Glacier Creek Eviction Risk: Lower , South Hill

Tract 53053071310 · Pierce County, WA · pop 7,646 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

In the The Ridge at Glacier Creek neighborhood of South Hill, census tract 53053071310 scores 5.7/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 63% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

67% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,190 a month against an average household income of $138,352 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 15% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 5% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units2,697
Renter share14.8%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate8.4%
Median income$138,352

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In The Ridge at Glacier Creek
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In South Hill
Moderate
Within county
32 th percentile
Rank, 32nd percentileLowHigh
#131 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Low
Within state
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#1,425 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across South Hill and the region

Centroid at 47.1299, -122.3386 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Ridge at Glacier Creek scores 2.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from South Hill
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
8.4% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$2,190 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from South Hill
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from South Hill
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from South Hill
5.0

How The Ridge at Glacier Creek compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Ridge at Glacier Creek risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.92.9This tracttract 071310South Hill: 6.96.9South Hillparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 24

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 85Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 3.19%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.6%Peak (2014)
  • 10Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530530713102004: 7 filings (6.39/100 renter HHs)2005: 5 filings (1.88/100 renter HHs)2006: 8 filings (3.00/100 renter HHs)2007: 4 filings (1.50/100 renter HHs)2008: 10 filings (3.75/100 renter HHs)2009: 7 filings (2.63/100 renter HHs)2010: 7 filings (2.90/100 renter HHs)2012: 7 filings (2.46/100 renter HHs)2013: 7 filings (2.46/100 renter HHs)2014: 13 filings (4.58/100 renter HHs)2015: 10 filings (3.52/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 43% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 46Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.62×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (3.01× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (4.48× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-10-01: 5 filings (15.15× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Ridge at Glacier Creek. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Ridge at Glacier Creek

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from South Hill eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Pierce County average of 5.5 and above the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 85 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 3.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.6% of renter households in 2014.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.62x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053071310

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053071310?

Census tract 53053071310 in the The Ridge at Glacier Creek neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053071310?

Median gross rent is $2,190/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053071310?

8.4% of residents in tract 53053071310 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,646.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053071310?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 37th, minority 50th, housing 31th.
Q5

Is tract 53053071310 considered part of The Ridge at Glacier Creek?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053071310 fall within The Ridge at Glacier Creek (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053071310?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 85 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053071310 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.19% of renter households, peaking at 4.6% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053071310 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.62× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 53053071310 compare to South Hill overall?

Tract 53053071310 scores 2.9/10, lower than the parent city of South Hill at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from South Hill eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related