Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,690 of 84,120 nationally

International District Eviction Risk: Elevated , Lakewood

Tract 53053071807 · Pierce County, WA · pop 3,485 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Census tract 53053071807 belongs to the International District neighborhood of Lakewood, Washington. It is home to 3,485 residents and scores 6.2/10, an elevated reading for landlords. It lands near the 79th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

61% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,592 a month against an average household income of $52,044 a year, roughly 37% of income at the averages. About 78% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 47% Stable renters 30% Owners 23%
Tract context
Occupied units1,585
Renter share77.6%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate20.3%
Median income$52,044

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In International District
Low
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 13 tracts In Lakewood
High
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Very High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#137 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lakewood and the region

Centroid at 47.1696, -122.4955 · click any tract to drill in

Why International District scores 6.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lakewood
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
20.3% poverty · this tract
5.1
Supply constraint
$1,592 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lakewood
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lakewood
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lakewood
6.8

How International District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
International District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.86.8This tracttract 071807Lakewood: 7.07.0Lakewoodparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 88

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 443Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 3.81%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.9%Peak (2015)
  • 72Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530530718072004: 29 filings (3.22/100 renter HHs)2005: 32 filings (2.83/100 renter HHs)2006: 30 filings (2.65/100 renter HHs)2007: 35 filings (3.09/100 renter HHs)2008: 41 filings (3.62/100 renter HHs)2009: 26 filings (2.30/100 renter HHs)2010: 23 filings (2.36/100 renter HHs)2012: 52 filings (5.01/100 renter HHs)2013: 37 filings (3.57/100 renter HHs)2014: 66 filings (6.36/100 renter HHs)2015: 72 filings (6.94/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 148% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 144Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.54×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 5 filings (0.52× baseline)2020-02-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (1.72× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-09-01: 4 filings (5.97× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (1.29× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (1.29× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2023-06-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 4 filings (0.41× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (2.58× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (8.96× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (0.41× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-03-01: 7 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-05-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (4.48× baseline)2025-10-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2026-01-01: 7 filings (0.72× baseline)2026-02-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 6 filings (2.58× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within International District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in International District

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lakewood eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Pierce County average of 5.5 and above the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.54x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 88th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053071807

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053071807?

Census tract 53053071807 in the International District neighborhood scores 6.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053071807?

Median gross rent is $1,592/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053071807?

20.3% of residents in tract 53053071807 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,485.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053071807?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 77th, minority 73th, housing 97th.
Q5

Is tract 53053071807 considered part of International District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053071807 fall within International District (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053071807?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 443 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053071807 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.81% of renter households, peaking at 6.9% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053071807 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.54× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 53053071807 compare to Lakewood overall?

Tract 53053071807 scores 6.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Lakewood at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lakewood eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lakewood

Top eight tracts in Lakewood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related